ReviewJournal of experimental orthopaedics2025
Artificial intelligence algorithms in orthopaedics: A narrative review of methods and clinical applications.
Review in Journal of experimental orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Applications of natural language processing and large language models in sports injury assessment and rehabilitation decision-making: a scoping review.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Integrating Artificial Intelligence into Orthopedic Practice: Modeling Attitudes and Intentions to Use AI.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence-Guided Precision Orthobiologics in Musculoskeletal Conditions.Journal of orthopaedic case reports · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence Applications in Implant Positioning, Dislocation Risk Prediction, and Surgical Indications in Orthopaedic Surgery.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Who Is the Surgeon Now: Human Hands or Machine Minds? Artificial Intelligence in Orthopedics from Diagnosis to Follow-Up-A Structured Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence algorithms in orthopaedics: A narrative review of methods and clinical applications.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This narrative review evaluates the role of artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms in orthopaedic surgery and distinguishes itself by explaining how the main algorithmic approaches function and illustrating each with orthopaedic examples. Machine learning methods, including regression, classification and reinforcement learning, have been applied to fracture detection, prediction of revision risk and modelling of outcomes after arthroplasty and sports injury. Deep learning and convolutional neural networks have improved fracture classification, implant surveillance and segmentation of cartilage and meniscal tissue on magnetic resonance imaging. Neural networks such as FracNet and YOLO-based systems demonstrate growing capability in trauma imaging. Natural language processing has automated the extraction of operative and registry data, while large language models are emerging for diagnostic support and education. Generative artificial intelligence (GAI) have produced synthetic musculoskeletal images to expand data sets. Computer vision and image processing underpin robotic-assisted surgery and preoperative planning, and federated learning enables multicentre collaboration while protecting privacy. Each algorithm offers strengths in accuracy, efficiency or scalability, but also carries bias, transparency, computational cost and lack of external validation. This review explores how these algorithms are shaping orthopaedics, highlighting their benefits, limitations and challenges. Rigorous validation, transparent reporting and governance are essential for safe clinical use. Level of Evidence: N/A.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.