ReviewMedComm2025
Progression and Metastasis of Lung Cancer: Clinical Features, Molecular Mechanisms, and Clinical Managements.
Review in MedComm, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A clinically relevant SLC2A1-associated malignant epithelial cell state predicts prognosis and immunotherapy response in lung adenocarcinoma.Functional & integrative genomics · 2026Article
- Suppressive role of SCN4B in the epithelial‑mesenchymal transition of lung adenocarcinoma.Oncology reports · 2026Article
- The PCNA inhibitor AOH1996 impairs tumor growth and invasiveness in non-small cell lung cancer.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lung cancer remains a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, with metastasis leading to a poor prognosis. While advances in primary tumor management have improved survival, disease dissemination to distant organs, particularly the liver, bone, and brain, represents an unresolved therapeutic challenge. Metastasis is governed by complex interactions between tumor cells and the microenvironment, including immune evasion, angiogenesis, and organotropism. Current therapies often fail to address site-specific molecular vulnerabilities or overcome physiological barriers such as the blood-brain barrier (BBB). A systematic review integrating clinical and mechanistic insights is urgently needed to guide translational efforts. This review synthesizes evidence on lung cancer metastases to three critical sites: liver metastases, where immunosuppressive niches and delayed diagnosis limit outcomes, and we emphasize the role of immune checkpoint inhibitors and liquid biopsies; bone metastases, characterized by osteolytic/osteoblastic lesions, which require biomarker-driven therapies and multimodal pain management; and brain metastases, where BBB penetration and heterogeneity demand tailored approaches. By dissecting organ-specific mechanisms, including circulating tumor cells, premetastatic niche formation, and metabolic reprogramming, this work highlights actionable targets for precision medicine. This review advocates for patient stratification and combination therapies to improve survival, offering a roadmap for future research on metastatic lung cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.