ArticleJournal of human kinetics2025
Application of the Performance Index for Monitoring Anaerobic Endurance of Competitive Swimmers.
Article in Journal of human kinetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of an 8-week technical tethered swimming program on front kinematics in adolescent swimmers.Scientific reports · 2025Trial
- Sex differences in three-dimensional intra-cycle velocity fluctuation and performance during freestyle swimming among high-level swimmers.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Validity and agreement of the 30-15 Intermittent Fitness Test for estimating aerobic and performance-related parameters: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of the study was to investigate the effectiveness of the performance index (PI) in monitoring anaerobic endurance of adult competitive swimmers during a nine-week intervention. The study included 30 male competitive swimmers. Participants were allocated to an advanced or an intermediate group, taking into account their training experience and sport results. Each participant was tasked with swimming eight lengths of a 25-m pool at maximum speed and full commitment with front crawl and with 15-s rest intervals between subsequent laps at the start of the intervention (pre-test) and nine weeks later (post-test). The performance index determined by the average speeds in successive laps was analysed. No statistically significant differences were observed between the groups in the calculated performance index at the end of the training cycle. A repeated measures ANOVA revealed an interaction between TIME (a repeated factor) and GROUP (a fix factor) (F1.28 = 25.45, p < 0.0001, η
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.