SynthesisFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2025
In-hospital mortality risk prediction models for patients with acute coronary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Immediate versus staged revascularization in acute coronary syndrome and multivessel disease: a meta-analysis and meta-regression of RCTs.Internal and emergency medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Right ventricular-pulmonary arterial uncoupling: an underrecognized predictor of in-hospital outcomes in acute myocardial infarction.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Article
- Development and validation of a risk prediction model for in-hospital mortality among patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by ventricular arrhythmia.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Article
- Multicenter development and validation of machine-learning risk models to predict procedural complete revascularization and in-hospital heart failure in STEMI patients treated with primary PCI.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To systematically evaluate in-hospital mortality risk prediction models for patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and provide valuable insights and references for the construction, application, and optimization of these models. Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted in five databases, including CNKI, Wanfang, PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase, from inception to November 2024. Researchers screened the literature, extracted relevant data, and assessed the quality of the prediction models using the Prediction Model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool (PROBAST). Extracted data included study design, data sources, outcome definitions, sample size, predictive factors, model development, and performance. Results: A total of 18 studies involving 44 prediction models were included. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) or C-index of these models ranged from 0.79 to 0.96. Overall, the included prediction models demonstrated a high risk of bias, primarily due to issues such as unreported missing data, methodological flaws in model construction, and a lack of model performance evaluation. Conclusion: The construction of in-hospital mortality risk prediction models for patients with ACS is still in the developmental stage. Future development and validation of prediction models should adhere to the PROBAST and TRIPOD guidelines to establish models with strong predictive performance and high generalizability. Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO CRD42024567755.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.