Evidence mapPaperPMID 41246018Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2025

In-hospital mortality risk prediction models for patients with acute coronary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Rui Jian, Jie Zhang, Yuxiu Zeng, Tian Zhou, Yan Wu, Lewen Wu, Yang Yu, Chongcheng Xi

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Rui JianChengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.
Jie ZhangChongqing Health College, Chongqing, China.
Yuxiu ZengChengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.
Tian ZhouChengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.
Yan WuChengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.
Lewen WuChengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.
Yang YuChengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.
Chongcheng XiChengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To systematically evaluate in-hospital mortality risk prediction models for patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and provide valuable insights and references for the construction, application, and optimization of these models. Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted in five databases, including CNKI, Wanfang, PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase, from inception to November 2024. Researchers screened the literature, extracted relevant data, and assessed the quality of the prediction models using the Prediction Model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool (PROBAST). Extracted data included study design, data sources, outcome definitions, sample size, predictive factors, model development, and performance. Results: A total of 18 studies involving 44 prediction models were included. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) or C-index of these models ranged from 0.79 to 0.96. Overall, the included prediction models demonstrated a high risk of bias, primarily due to issues such as unreported missing data, methodological flaws in model construction, and a lack of model performance evaluation. Conclusion: The construction of in-hospital mortality risk prediction models for patients with ACS is still in the developmental stage. Future development and validation of prediction models should adhere to the PROBAST and TRIPOD guidelines to establish models with strong predictive performance and high generalizability. Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO CRD42024567755.

Indexed as

acute coronary syndromein-hospital mortalitymodelsrisk predictionsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID41246018
PMCPMC12616422

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.