ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Machine learning-based analysis of factors influencing surgical duration in type A aortic dissection.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- AI-Driven Innovations in Transfusion Medicine: A Narrative Synthesis of Current Reviews.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Stanford Type A aortic dissection (TAAD) is a life-threatening condition involving the ascending aorta and requires urgent surgery. This study developed 11 machine learning regression models to predict operative duration and identify key clinical factors influencing surgical time in TAAD. Materials and methods: In this single-center retrospective cohort study of 505 patients who underwent surgery from December 2017 to March 2023. Specifically, 11 machine learning models were construct using 47 preoperative and intraoperative features to predict operative duration. Model performance was assessed by R Results: The study primarily consisted of middle-aged patients, comprising 73.4% males and 26.6% females. Furthermore, most patients underwent complex aortic procedures under time-constrained preoperative conditions. Procedures involving root replacement and total arch replacement were associated with longer surgical durations. The ExtraTrees Regressor had the highest predictive accuracy. SHAP analysis revealed five key features: Duration of extracorporeal circulation, Duration of aortic occlusion, Intraoperative blood transfusion, Treatment method for the aortic arch, and Treatment method for the aortic root. Conclusion: This study developed high-performance predictive models to identify key features affecting operative duration in TAAD surgery. Complex reconstructions prolong procedures, and longer aortic occlusion further contributes to this effect. The findings highlight the major influence of surgical strategies and intraoperative management on surgical duration. Special consideration remains warranted for specific patient subgroups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.