Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41246205›Full record

ArticleDigital health

Development of an interpretable ensemble learning model for thalassemia detection in pregnant women using routine hematological parameters.

Qian Wang, Xianning Dai, Kai Xu, Mengjie Xu, Jianchao Ying

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Qian WangDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Wenzhou People's Hospital, The Third Clinical Institute Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-5620-9407
Xianning DaiDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Wenzhou People's Hospital, The Third Clinical Institute Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Kai XuDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Wenzhou People's Hospital, The Third Clinical Institute Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Mengjie XuDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Wenzhou People's Hospital, The Third Clinical Institute Affiliated to Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Jianchao YingWenzhou Key Laboratory of Emergency, Critical Care, and Disaster Medicine, Emergency Department, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6341-5903

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Thalassemia is a common hereditary anemia that poses diagnostic challenges during pregnancy due to physiological changes in hematological parameters. Misdiagnosis or delayed diagnosis can result in serious maternal and fetal complications. Although genetic testing is the gold standard for thalassemia diagnosis, its high cost and limited availability restrict its use in primary care settings. This study aimed to develop and validate a clinically interpretable machine learning model to identify thalassemia in pregnant women using routine complete blood count indicators. Methods: A total of 523 pregnant patients were retrospectively enrolled in this study. Eight predictive features were selected using the Boruta algorithm. Multiple machine learning algorithms were trained and evaluated using ten-fold cross-validation. An ensemble model was constructed through bagging and weighted integration of top-performing models. Model performance was assessed using a series of metrics such as AUROC, AUPRC, accuracy, F1-score, and MCC. Comparative evaluation was conducted against traditional diagnostic indices and a recently proposed model. Model interpretability was analyzed using permutation importance and SHAP methods. Results: The Thal-classifier, constructed by integrating four bagged machine learning models, was developed for accurate identification of thalassemia. It exhibited excellent diagnostic performance, with an AUROC of 0.945 on the cross-validation and 0.899 on the independent testing dataset. Compared with the existing indices and models, it achieved superior performance across multiple evaluation metrics. Feature importance analyses consistently identified RDW-SD and MCHC as the primary predictive features. Conclusion: Thal-classifier is a practical and reliable tool for early detection of thalassemia in pregnant populations, offering valuable support for prenatal screening and individualized clinical decision-making.

Indexed as

diagnostic modelMachine learningpregnant womenroutine hematological parameterthalassemia

Identifiers

PMID41246205
PMCPMC12615933

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.