ArticleDigital health
Development of an interpretable ensemble learning model for thalassemia detection in pregnant women using routine hematological parameters.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Thalassemia is a common hereditary anemia that poses diagnostic challenges during pregnancy due to physiological changes in hematological parameters. Misdiagnosis or delayed diagnosis can result in serious maternal and fetal complications. Although genetic testing is the gold standard for thalassemia diagnosis, its high cost and limited availability restrict its use in primary care settings. This study aimed to develop and validate a clinically interpretable machine learning model to identify thalassemia in pregnant women using routine complete blood count indicators. Methods: A total of 523 pregnant patients were retrospectively enrolled in this study. Eight predictive features were selected using the Boruta algorithm. Multiple machine learning algorithms were trained and evaluated using ten-fold cross-validation. An ensemble model was constructed through bagging and weighted integration of top-performing models. Model performance was assessed using a series of metrics such as AUROC, AUPRC, accuracy, F1-score, and MCC. Comparative evaluation was conducted against traditional diagnostic indices and a recently proposed model. Model interpretability was analyzed using permutation importance and SHAP methods. Results: The Thal-classifier, constructed by integrating four bagged machine learning models, was developed for accurate identification of thalassemia. It exhibited excellent diagnostic performance, with an AUROC of 0.945 on the cross-validation and 0.899 on the independent testing dataset. Compared with the existing indices and models, it achieved superior performance across multiple evaluation metrics. Feature importance analyses consistently identified RDW-SD and MCHC as the primary predictive features. Conclusion: Thal-classifier is a practical and reliable tool for early detection of thalassemia in pregnant populations, offering valuable support for prenatal screening and individualized clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.