ReviewFrontiers in medical technology2025
Microbiome-based therapeutics for metabolic disorders: harnessing microbial intrusions for treatment.
Review in Frontiers in medical technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Vaginal Microecological Imbalance, Human Papillomavirus Infection, and Cervical Carcinogenesis: Mechanisms and Clinical Implications.International journal of general medicine · 2026Review
- Gut microbiota as modulators of obesity and overweight: a registry-based systematic review of clinical trial evidence.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Bacterial secondary metabolites as resistance-modifying adjuvants: microbial origins, molecular mechanisms, and translational relevance.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The rising global rates of metabolic disorders, such as obesity, type 2 diabetes, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, and metabolic syndrome, call for new treatment methods beyond traditional drugs. The human gut microbiota, made up of trillions of microorganisms that plays a crucial role in maintaining metabolic balance through complex biochemical processes and interactions between hosts and microbes. Dysbiosis, which involves changes in microbial composition and a decrease in diversity, has become a major factor in metabolic problems. This disruption impacts the production of short-chain fatty acid, increase in permeability of intestine, and causes enduring low-grade inflammation. This review features into the potential of treatments based on microbiome for metabolic syndromes, focusing on probiotics, prebiotics, synbiotics, and postbiotics. It also encompasses innovative methods such as engineered microbial consortium, fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT), and vaginal microbiota transplantation (VMT). Probiotics show significant promise in improving blood sugar control and enhancing lipid levels. Prebiotics help bring about positive changes in microbial composition and the production of beneficial metabolites. Synbiotic combinations provide added benefits by helping good microbes thrive while supplying nutrients they can ferment. Postbiotics have recent research focus because they are safer, more stable, easier to store, and less likely to contribute to antibiotic resistance comparative to live probiotics. Even now there are substantial complications in translating microbiome research into standardized therapeutics despite of promising pre-clinical outcomes and some initial clinical data. These comprises individual variances, strain-specificity, dosage problems, regulation issues, and the necessity for personalised treatment strategies. Future success will depend upon personalized medicine, technological developments, and the incorporation of multi-omics strategy to generate metabolic health therapeutics depending on targeted microbiomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.