ReviewClinical interventions in aging2025
Balance and Gait Disorders in the Aged Population. Causes, Assessment and Management: A Literature Review.
Review in Clinical interventions in aging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Feasibility of Gamified EEG Neurofeedback Combined with Adaptive Working-Memory Training in Older Adults: A Pilot Study.Brain sciences · 2026Article
- Mechanistic Pathways Linking Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Hypertension, and Osteoarthritis to Falls in Older Adults: A Scoping Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Editorial: Technological Advances for Gait and Balance Assessment.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With aging, compensatory mechanisms and physiological reserve may become insufficient to maintain balance and gait (BG), particularly when associated with stroke, Alzheimer's disease, diabetes, osteoarticular diease, vestibular disorders, orthostatic hypotension (OH), heart rhythm disorders, or drug side effects. This leads to poorer postural-motor function and increased risk of falling (RoF). This review aims to highlight recent scientific advancements relative to BG disorders (BGDs) for gerontology professionals. When assessing older adults (OAs) with BGDs, a thorough assessment of patient history is needed to identify the origins. This should include the history of falls, an inventory of medications, and an analysis of the home environment. A comprehensive clinical examination is also required to guide etiological diagnoses. A clinical suspicion of cardiac arrhythmia/conduction disorders, for example, will be confirmed by electrocardiogram (ECG)/Holter ECG, whereas suspected OH (on questioning) will be confirmed by an OH test, and, in the presence of confusion, epilepsy will be confirmed by the electroencephalogram. Several tools, ranging from simple and quick to more complex and thorough, have been validated to evaluate BGDs in OAs. These tests involve activities of daily living tasks required to preserve independence. Emerging technologies for RoF assessment (ie, surface electromyography, force platforms, three-dimensional motion capture systems) while not yet used in routine geriatric practice, can improve early detection, monitoring, and rehabilitation. Optimal BGD management requires the implication of several health professionals. Rehabilitation programs such as the "Otago exercise programme" and "falls management exercise" have been validated. Assistive technologies (canes, walkers, grab bars, and orthopedic footwear or automated alert systems), and new technologies (virtual reality) can also be used. Additional steps include medication review and deprescribing, occupational therapy and home environment adaptations. Understanding and managing BGDs in OAs remains a major public health issue, and is vital for preserving independence in later life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.