ReviewCureus2025
Effectiveness of Telehealth and Wearable Device-Based Interventions for Managing Childhood and Adolescent Obesity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Digital health interventions for promoting physical activity among adolescents: a systematic review.Frontiers in public health · 2026Pooled it
- Telehealth Vs. Face-to-Face Treatment for Children and Adolescents With Obesity: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Pediatric obesity · 2026Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Adolescent and childhood obesity is a growing public health concern, with traditional interventions often facing challenges related to long-term adherence and reach. Mobile health (mHealth) interventions, including smartphone applications, text messaging, and wearable devices, have emerged as a promising and accessible strategy to promote healthy behaviors. This study systematically reviews the impact of mHealth interventions on body mass index (BMI), adiposity, and related behavioral and psychosocial outcomes in overweight and obese adolescents as well as children. A systematic review of 10 clinical trials was conducted, including studies that examined mHealth interventions in overweight or obese adolescent populations. Primary outcomes focused on weight, BMI, and adiposity, while secondary outcomes encompassed physical activity levels, dietary habits, and psychosocial factors. Data was extracted and synthesized narratively to evaluate clinical trends and identify key factors influencing intervention efficacy. The effectiveness of mHealth interventions on primary weight outcomes was found to be variable and inconsistent. While several studies reported no significant reduction in BMI or adiposity, others demonstrated positive effects, particularly with more comprehensive and tailored programs. The meta-analysis demonstrated that mHealth interventions consistently had a positive and significant impact on secondary outcomes. Specifically, they were found to increase physical activity, improve dietary habits (e.g., lower fast-food consumption), and enhance psychosocial factors such as health knowledge and attitudes. Overall, mHealth interventions serve as a valuable tool for promoting healthy behaviors and improving secondary clinical markers in adolescents as well as children. Although their direct effect on BMI and weight is mixed, the consistent positive impact on behavioral outcomes suggests their potential as an effective adjunctive strategy in obesity management. The effectiveness appears to depend heavily on the design and intensity of the intervention, highlighting the importance of developing comprehensive and well-structured digital programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.