Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41246623›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

Use of Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Non-diabetic Individuals for Cardiovascular Prevention: A Systematic Review of Its Impact on Guiding Lifestyle Interventions.

Nour Ahmed, Mohamed Faisal Elzein Ali, Muhanad Noureldin Hamed Mohamed, Rayan Saad Aldeen Mohammed Saad Aldeen, Rayan Ismat Ibrahim Omer, Tasabeeh Musa Adam Omer, Riham Abdelmagid ElTahir Hamza, Malak Rabih Musa Rabih

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Technology in Diabetes: A Year in Review.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Nour AhmedEndocrine and Diabetes, George Eliot Hospital National Health Service (NHS) Trust, Nuneaton, GBR.
Mohamed Faisal Elzein AliPolice Health Services, Saad Abdullah Academy Hospital, Kuwait City, KWT.
Muhanad Noureldin Hamed MohamedMedicine, Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals National Health Service (NHS) Trust, London, GBR.
Rayan Saad Aldeen Mohammed Saad AldeenMedicine, Igraa College of Science and Technology, Wad Madani, SDN.
Rayan Ismat Ibrahim OmerStroke Medicine, Barts Health National Health Service (NHS) Trust, London, GBR.
Tasabeeh Musa Adam OmerFamily Medicine, Nad Al Hamar Health Center, Dubai, ARE.
Riham Abdelmagid ElTahir HamzaInternal Medicine, King Salman Armed Forces Hospital, Tabuk, SAU.
Malak Rabih Musa RabihInternal Medicine, National University Sudan, Nottingham, GBR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a leading global cause of mortality, with prevention through lifestyle modification being paramount. Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM), which provides real-time, dynamic glycemic data, is increasingly being explored in non-diabetic populations to guide lifestyle interventions. This systematic review aims to synthesize the evidence on the use of CGM in non-diabetic individuals for guiding lifestyle modifications and assess its impact on cardiovascular risk prevention. A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov from January 2020 to August 2025. Studies investigating CGM-guided lifestyle interventions in non-diabetic adults and reporting cardiovascular risk factors or metabolic outcomes were included. Study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment (using Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 (RoB 2) for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) for non-randomized studies) were performed by independent reviewers. A narrative synthesis was conducted due to study heterogeneity. Seven studies were included. CGM was used to personalize exercise timing, such as initiating walking before an individual's postprandial glucose peak, which significantly reduced postprandial glucose, insulin, and C-peptide levels. CGM also served as a motivational tool, increasing readiness for physical activity. Observational studies demonstrated CGM's ability to identify subclinical dysregulation in conditions like menopause and obstructive sleep apnea, linking higher glycemic variability to surrogate markers of cardiovascular risk, such as blood pressure variability. The overall risk of bias was low for six studies and serious for one, primarily due to confounding. Direct evidence on changes in traditional cardiovascular risk factors was limited. CGM shows promise for personalizing lifestyle interventions and improving glycemic outcomes in non-diabetic individuals, which are key surrogates for cardiovascular risk. Its utility lies in optimizing physical activity timing, enhancing motivation, and identifying at-risk metabolic phenotypes. However, evidence of a direct impact on hard cardiovascular endpoints remains limited. Future long-term trials should focus not on reaffirming the established link between glycemic variability and cardiovascular risk but on evaluating whether CGM-guided behavioral interventions offer a cost-effective and sustainable approach to enhancing cardiovascular prevention strategies in non-diabetic populations.

Indexed as

cardiovascular preventioncontinuous glucose monitoringglycemic variabilitylifestyle interventionnon-diabeticphysical activitysystematic review

Identifiers

PMID41246623
PMCPMC12612783

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.