ArticleCureus2025
Cardiovascular Outcomes of SGLT-2 Inhibitors in Hypertensive Patients With and Without Diabetes: A Retrospective Observational Study.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Hypertension, with or without type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), is a major contributor to cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors, originally developed for glycemic control, have demonstrated cardioprotective benefits. However, real-world data on their cardiovascular outcomes in hypertensive patients with and without diabetes remain limited. Objectives This study aimed to assess whether SGLT-2 inhibitor therapy improves blood pressure control and reduces cardiovascular events in hypertensive patients and to compare these outcomes between those with and without T2DM. Methodology This retrospective observational study was conducted at the HITEC Institute of Medical Sciences, Taxila, over 12 months. Medical records of 200 hypertensive patients prescribed SGLT-2 inhibitors were reviewed and categorized into two groups: diabetics (n = 100) and non-diabetics (n = 100). Baseline demographics, comorbidities, laboratory findings, and concomitant medications were recorded. To minimize confounding from other drugs, only patients on stable antihypertensive regimens for at least six months prior to SGLT-2 inhibitor initiation were included. Blood pressure changes were assessed from baseline to six months, and cardiovascular outcomes (hospitalization for heart failure, myocardial infarction, and all-cause mortality) were evaluated using hospital records. Statistical analysis involved paired t-tests, chi-square tests, and Cox regression models. Results The mean age of the participants was 56.4 ± 9.8 years, with 58% males. BMI was significantly higher in diabetics than in non-diabetics (29.2 ± 4.1 vs. 27.5 ± 3.9 kg/m², p = 0.01). As expected, diabetics had higher fasting glucose and HbA1c (p < 0.001), while lipid and renal profiles were comparable. After six months, both groups showed significant reductions in systolic and diastolic blood pressure (p < 0.001), with greater systolic reduction in diabetics (-12.5 vs. -9.7 mmHg, p = 0.04). During follow-up, diabetics experienced more cardiovascular events than non-diabetics: hospitalization for heart failure (6% vs. 3%), myocardial infarction (5% vs. 2%), and all-cause mortality (5% vs. 2%). Cox regression identified higher baseline HbA1c and longer hypertension duration as independent predictors of adverse events. Conclusion SGLT-2 inhibitors significantly improve blood pressure control and reduce cardiovascular events in hypertensive patients, regardless of diabetic status. However, patients with diabetes exhibit a higher residual risk, highlighting the need for integrated management strategies addressing glycemic and cardiovascular risk factors. The retrospective design allowed real-world evaluation of outcomes, though prospective studies are warranted to confirm these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.