Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41247353›Full record

ArticleAnalytical chemistry2025

Self-Regulated Selective Surface Coating Enables Confinement of Adherent Cells in Closed Microfluidic Arrays.

Anna Kaehr, Guillaume Aubry, Hang Lu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Analytical chemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Anna KaehrSchool of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, 311 Ferst Drive NW, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, United States.
Guillaume AubrySchool of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, 311 Ferst Drive NW, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-7828-8508
Hang LuSchool of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, 311 Ferst Drive NW, Atlanta, Georgia 30332, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-6881-660X

Funding

Modularly built, complete, coordinate- and template-free brain atlasesR01MH130064 · NIMH · GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI LU, HANG, ZHANG, YUN · 2022 to 2025
$2.6M
Functional Analysis of Whole-Brain Dynamics in LearningR01NS115484 · NINDS · HARVARD UNIVERSITY · PI LU, HANG, ZHANG, YUN · 2020 to 2024
$2.4M
Inferring multi-scale dynamics underlying behavior in aging C. elegansR01AG082039 · NIA · GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI Gordon Joseph Berman, Hang Lu · 2023 to 2026
$2.1M
In-line, Non-invasive, Real-time 3D Quantitative Phase Microscopy for OrganoidsR21NS117067 · NINDS · GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI LU, HANG, ROBLES, FRANCISCO E · 2020 to 2020
$426k
Droplet-based platform for functional neuronal imaging of developing nervous systemR21NS117066 · NINDS · GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI AUBRY, GUILLAUME, LU, HANG · 2020 to 2020
$407k
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG082039NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH130064NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS115484NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS117066NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS117067
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phenotypical screening assays involving adherent cell culture are essential for research in cell biology and toxicology as well as drug discovery. Such assays often involve hundreds of culture chambers and monitor cell responses for hours. Microfluidic arrays have been widely used for cell assays; however, creating dense arrays of adherent cells is challenging because adherent cells may migrate over time. To confine cells, existing techniques rely on actuators such as valves or surface micropatterning; yet, both present important drawbacks. The actuator-based systems often require complex fabrication and equipment for operation. Noncontact surface patterning techniques for closed microfluidic channels typically require expensive reagents (e.g., photosensitive ones) and precise alignment, whereas contact techniques to pattern open surfaces make sealing the device after patterning difficult and are susceptible to contamination. Here, we present an inexpensive, selective surface-coating method for micropatterning proteins to confine adherent cells in closed microfluidic devices. Using capillary valves, pressure-driven flow, and sequential reagent delivery, we can spatially and temporally expose the channels to cell adhesion molecules and blocking agents separately. We show a large window of operating pressures, up to 4 psi, ensuring robust selective patterning. In the patterned devices, we also demonstrate successful cell culture for over 20 h, with cells remaining spatially confined. This technique offers a cost-effective and scalable solution for creating microarrays of adherent cells without complex equipment or expensive reagents. Its simplicity and ability to pattern in closed microchannels may also benefit applications beyond cell-based assays such as biomolecule detection and other surface-based processes.

Indexed as

Microfluidic Analytical TechniquesAnimalsCell AdhesionHumansSurface Properties

Identifiers

PMID41247353
PMCPMC12676511

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.