ArticleDiabetologia2026
Diverse combination of factors associated with the development of diabetic kidney disease among data-driven diabetes subtypes: analysis of the J-DREAMS registry.
Article in Diabetologia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Clustering-derived clinical subtypes and outcomes of chronic kidney disease in patients with diabetes: a multicenter cohort study.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aims/hypothesisAvailable methods for predicting the onset and progression of diabetic kidney disease (DKD) and end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) are not yet ready for clinical application. We used a Japanese diabetes cohort study (J-DREAMS) to examine whether the Ahlqvist et al diabetes clustering is useful for stratifying DKD or ESKD outcomes independent of known risk factors in real-world settings.
methodsData-driven cluster analysis using k-means was performed based on GAD antibody levels, age at diagnosis, BMI, HbA
resultsDiabetes clustering classified individuals in the J-DREAMS cohort into five subtypes, the clinical characteristics of which were comparable to those of the previously reported five subtypes. Kaplan-Meier curve analysis showed that events for chronic kidney disease (CKD) stages 3b, 4 and 5 were highest in the severe insulin-resistant diabetes subtype. The Cox proportional hazards model showed that the severe insulin-resistant diabetes subtype had significant HRs after correction for multiple confounding factors. The Cox proportional hazards model showed that each subtype had a diverse combination of factors associated with CKD stage 3b and proteinuria events. CONCLUSIONS/
interpretationData-driven analysis provides diabetes subtyping, which can predict the probability of developing DKD/ESKD; each subtype has diverse combinations of factors predisposing to DKD development and progression. Data-driven diabetes subtyping to predict the likelihood of developing DKD/ESKD and mitigating predisposing factors may help personalise prevention strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.