Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41247734›Full record

Trial reportJAMA network open2025

Community Health Worker and Mobile Health Interventions for Quality of Life Among Young Adults With Sickle Cell Disease: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Sophia Jan, Caren Steinway, Tanisha Belton, Justine Shults, Laura Bennett, Olivia Teng, Heather Griffis, Banu Aygun, Abena Appiah-Kubi, Nataly Apollonsky and 9 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03648710 (Community Health Workers and Mobile Health for Emerging Adults Transitioning Sickle Cell Disease Care), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03648710 nacompletednot on this map

Community Health Workers and Mobile Health for Emerging Adults Transitioning Sickle Cell Disease Care

TypeinterventionalSponsorChildren's Hospital of PhiladelphiaRan2019 to 2024Enrolled405ConditionsSickle Cell DiseaseArmsPeer Community Health Worker, Mobile Health
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Sophia JanDepartment of Pediatrics, Northwell Health, Long Island, New York.
Caren SteinwayDepartment of Pediatrics, Northwell Health, Long Island, New York.
Tanisha BeltonPolicyLab, Division of General Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Justine ShultsChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Laura BennettDepartment of Biomedical and Health Informatics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Olivia TengDepartment of Pediatrics, Northwell Health, Long Island, New York.
Heather GriffisDepartment of Biomedical and Health Informatics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Banu AygunDepartment of Pediatrics, Northwell Health, Long Island, New York.
Abena Appiah-KubiDepartment of Pediatrics, Northwell Health, Long Island, New York.
Nataly ApollonskyDrexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Donna BoruchovConnecticut Children's Medical Center, Hartford.
Omar NissDepartment of Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio.
Lisa SchwartzDivision of Oncology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Lori CrosbyDepartment of Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio.
Lamia BarakatDivision of Oncology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Biree AndemariamNew England Sickle Cell Institute, University of Connecticut Health, Farmington.
Siddika S MulchanConnecticut Children's Medical Center, Hartford.
David RubinUniversity of California Health, Oakland.
Kim Smith-WhitleyDivision of General Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Young adults with sickle cell disease (SCD) experience challenges transitioning from pediatric to adult care, leading to increased morbidity and mortality. Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of community health worker (CHW) support or a mobile health application (mHealth) compared with enhanced usual care (EUC) in improving health-related quality of life (HRQOL) for young adults with SCD transitioning to adult care. Design, Setting, and Participants: The Community Health Workers and Mobile Health for Emerging Adults Transitioning Sickle Cell Disease Care study was an observer-blinded, multicenter, randomized clinical trial performed at 5 US children's hospitals with a recruitment period from January 15, 2019, to December 31, 2022, and data analysis performed from September 30, 2024, to June 30, 2025. Participants were 17 years or older with SCD. Interventions: Participants were randomized 1:1:1 to 6 months of EUC, CHW plus EUC, or mHealth plus EUC. Both interventions included goal setting, self-management, skill development, symptom tracking, and transition support. The CHW plus EUC intervention provided weekly synchronous support primarily via phone calls, while mHealth plus EUC offered virtual peer support via interaction with discussion boards. The EUC group received standard care consisting of a transition checklist for consistency across sites. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcome was HRQOL, assessed using the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) for SCD module. Clinically meaningful improvement was prespecified as a 10-point change. Secondary outcomes included SCD knowledge, transition readiness, and social support. All outcomes were collected at baseline and follow-ups at 6, 12, and 18 months. Results: Of the 700 eligible patients across the 5 sites, 405 were enrolled, and 375 participants with SCD were randomized, 191 (51.5%) of whom were women. The mean (SD) age was 18.9 (1.9) years; the median age was 18.0 (IQR, 17-20) years. Baseline demographic data, clinical characteristics, and markers of disease severity were comparable across the study groups. At 6 months, the CHW plus EUC group showed modest improvements in HRQOL compared with the EUC group at 2.67 (95% CI, 0.25-5.09) at 6 months; there was no change for the mHealth plus EUC group at 0.73 (95% CI, -1.48 to 2.93) at 6 months; and the EUC group had a decline of 2.58 (95% CI, -4.67 to -0.49). CHW support demonstrated the greatest improvement in PedsQL scores compared with EUC at 6 (5.25 [95% CI, 2.05-8.45] points), 12 (5.56 [95% CI, 1.52-9.61] points), and 18 (6.14 [95% CI, 1.75-10.54] points) months. The mHealth plus EUC intervention demonstrated improvement in PedsQL scores at 6 months only (3.31 [95% CI, 0.27-6.35] points). Throughout the study, the HRQOL for the EUC group declined. No significant differences were found in secondary outcomes. Conclusions and Relevance: Although neither intervention met the prespecified 10-point threshold for a large clinical effect, the CHW intervention produced a significant and durable improvement in HRQOL that halted the decline observed in EUC. This sustained effect during the 18 months of follow-up suggests that CHW support provides a clinically relevant benefit for young adults with SCD during their transition to adult care. Integrating such programs into routine care could improve outcomes for this vulnerable population. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03648710.

Indexed as

Anemia, Sickle CellCommunity Health WorkersQuality of LifeTelemedicineAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleTransition to Adult CareYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID41247734
PMCPMC12625686

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.