Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41248374›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Evaluating health system expenditure across the rural-urban spectrum in New Zealand: a study protocol.

Talis Liepins, June Atkinson, Gabrielle Davie, William Leung, Sue Crengle, Rawiri Keenan, Jesse Whitehead, Tim Stokes, Garry Nixon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Talis LiepinsCentre for Rural Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand lieta476@student.otago.ac.nz.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-0926-2578
June AtkinsonDepartment of Public Health, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand.
Gabrielle DavieDepartment of Preventive and Social Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5466-5364
William LeungDepartment of Public Health, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand.
Sue CrengleNgāi Tahu Māori Health Research Unit, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9367-1492
Rawiri KeenanDivision of Health, The University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand.
Jesse WhiteheadTe Ngira Institute for Population Research, The University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9682-7544
Tim StokesDepartment of Primary Health Care, Faculty of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1127-1952
Garry NixonCentre for Rural Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionInequities in health status exist in New Zealand across the rural-urban spectrum. In parallel, rural-urban differences in health service utilisation vary by service type. Despite the New Zealand public health system being based on principles of universal access, equity and fairness, levels of health expenditure on rural and urban populations are not well understood. The purpose of the study is to undertake a rural-urban analysis of public health system expenditure, based on individual-level service utilisation and national pricing of health service events. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Individual-level service utilisation and pricing will be collated from national collection databases for all eligible users of publicly funded services. The analysis will include calendar years 2017-2024. Descriptive analysis and a two-part generalised linear regression model will be used to identify if rural-urban differences in expenditure exist, and what the association of rurality is with expenditure (if any). The model will also be used to identify geographic regions with expenditure levels that vary from those predicted using regression model weights. As the specific statistical approach will be determined by data attributes, this protocol outlines the intended approach to construct the analytical model. ETHICS AND CONSULTATION: Ethics approval was obtained from the University of Otago Human Research Ethics Committee (HD23/052). Māori consultation has been undertaken with the Ngāi Tahu Research Consultation Committee and will continue throughout the research process.

Indexed as

Health ExpendituresRural Health ServicesRural PopulationUrban Health ServicesUrban PopulationHumansLinear ModelsNew ZealandResearch DesignHealth Care CostsHEALTH ECONOMICSHealth EquityHealth policyHealth Services

Identifiers

PMID41248374
PMCPMC12636956

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.