Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41248462›Full record

Trial reportJournal of medical Internet research2025

Application of Narrative and AI-Assisted Follow-Up After Voluntary Medical Male Circumcision: Multicenter, Double-Blind, Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial.

Linfeng Wang, Yueqiang Peng, Gaojie Zhang, Yong Huang, Guo Yang, Yu Jiang, Qiao Xu, Jiang Yu, Jiajia Jin, Hong Qiao and 4 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Linfeng Wang *Department of Urology, First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, No. 1 Youyi Road, Chongqing, Yuzhong District, 400016, China, 86 18696682178.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-9311-2834
Yueqiang Peng *Department of Urology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6990-5367
Gaojie Zhang *Department of Urology, First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, No. 1 Youyi Road, Chongqing, Yuzhong District, 400016, China, 86 18696682178.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-9999-9944
Yong Huang *Department of Urology, First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, No. 1 Youyi Road, Chongqing, Yuzhong District, 400016, China, 86 18696682178.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-3371-8517
Guo YangDepartment of Urology, First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, No. 1 Youyi Road, Chongqing, Yuzhong District, 400016, China, 86 18696682178.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-3683-5587
Yu JiangDepartment of Urology, First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2815-9019
Qiao XuDepartment of Urology, Yongchuan Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-9036-1022
Jiang YuSchool of Nursing, Xiangya Medical School, Sichuan, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-0355-6384
Jiajia JinDepartment of Psychiatry, Chongqing Cancer Hospital, Chongqing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9193-0339
Hong QiaoSchool of Nursing, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-1675-0128
Qingyu WuSchool of Nursing, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-0910-2054
Ziling WeiSchool of the First Clinical Medicine, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-5271-3904
Wei TangDepartment of Urology, First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, No. 1 Youyi Road, Chongqing, Yuzhong District, 400016, China, 86 18696682178.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-1493-4061
Jiayu LiuDepartment of Urology, First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, No. 1 Youyi Road, Chongqing, Yuzhong District, 400016, China, 86 18696682178.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3874-3075

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Postoperative anxiety following voluntary medical male circumcision (VMMC) poses a significant health challenge, with limited telemedicine access and inadequate communication compromising recovery and adherence. Narrative-based interventions have shown promise in reducing psychological distress in other contexts, and large language models may enable automated follow-up, but their role in VMMC care remains underexplored. Objective: We evaluated the effect of a narrative-enhanced tool (NET) on anxiety, sleep quality, quality of life, and pain management and identified risk factors for postoperative anxiety. We also assessed the feasibility of an artificial intelligence-assisted consultation (AAC) system in improving follow-up efficiency. Methods: From October 1, 2023, to April 29, 2024, patients aged ≥15 years undergoing VMMC were recruited and randomized 1:1 to a standardized risk tool (SRT) or NET group. In addition to the routine postoperative communication, the NET group received a narrative video highlighting positive recovery experiences. Both groups accessed an AAC chatbot for automated follow-ups. Primary outcomes were anxiety levels measured by the 7-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale (GAD-7), sleep quality measured by Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, quality of life measured by 3-level EuroQoL 5D questionnaire, and pain levels measured by Numerical Rating Scale. Secondary outcomes included analgesic use, satisfaction, and health care worker efficiency. Repeated measures ANOVA assessed trends and regression identified risk factors for anxiety. Results: Between October 1, 2023, and April 29, 2024, 671 eligible participants were enrolled, with 388 completing the 30-day follow-up (SRT group: n=189, mean age 26.21, SD 3.69 years; NET group: n=199, mean age 26.41, SD 3.56 years; P=.60). Both groups exhibited increased anxiety levels, diminished quality of life, and poorer sleep quality during the 30-day postoperative period. However, compared to SRT, the NET group demonstrated lower GAD-7 scores (7.06, SD 2.73 vs. 9.95, SD 3.50; P<.001), improved sleep quality (12.29, SD 3.57 vs 13.20, SD 3.54; P=.01), higher quality of life scores (0.87, SD 0.07 vs 0.84, SD 0.09; P<.001), more regular analgesic use (154/173, 89.02% vs 100/169, 59.17%; P<.001), reduced opioid consumption (5/173, 2.89% vs 25/169, 14.79%; P<.001), and higher pain medication satisfaction (4.21, SD 0.69 vs 3.76, SD 0.97; P<.001). Multivariate analysis identified SRT assignment, inability to recall opioid risk levels, hematoma, swelling, and pain as independent risk factors for elevated GAD-7 scores. Implementation of the AAC substantially reduced health care worker follow-up time (2.34, SD 1.95 min vs 7.85, SD 2.65 min; P<.001). Conclusions: The study demonstrates that narrative is effective in reducing anxiety, improving quality of life, and improving pain management post-VMMC. The integration of artificial intelligence into clinical follow-up protocols has the potential to enhance health care worker efficiency without compromising patient satisfaction.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceCircumcision, MaleNarrationAdolescentAdultAnxietyDouble-Blind MethodFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPain ManagementProspective StudiesQuality of LifeSleep QualityTelemedicineAIanxietyartificial intelligencenarrativespatient-clinician communicationVMMCvoluntary medical male circumcision

Identifiers

PMID41248462
PMCPMC12622909

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.