FLASH effect is diminished by daily fractionation of electron RT in mouse skin.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Conditional sparing in FLASH radiotherapy: Conformal dosimetry and ALARA remain essential.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2026
   Review
2. Systematic tissue oxygen variation shows the modulation of murine skin radiation toxicity at ultra-high dose rates.Physics in medicine and biology · 2026
   Article
3. FLASH radiotherapy preserves systemic and tissue homeostasis while maintaining antitumor efficacy.BMC medicine · 2026
   Article
4. PEERing into the Future: Benchmarking the ANSTO Australian Synchrotron's Very-High-Energy Electron Linac for Ultra-High Dose-Rate, In Vivo FLASH Radiotherapy Research.Cancers · 2026
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as