ArticleBiological psychology2025
Child and adolescent internalizing and externalizing traits, and epigenetic summary scores: A scoping review.
Article in Biological psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Challenging the prescientific frameworks of criminal justice: neurobiology and criminolytic interventions in the legalome era.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To better understand the relationship between DNA methylation summary measures and childhood behavioral and emotional problems, this scoping review synthesizes current research on the associations between DNA methylation and internalizing or externalizing traits or behaviors in children and adolescents. By identifying which psychological phenotypes are most consistently linked to DNA methylation summary measures and contextualizing research practices, this review highlights key methodological trends and gaps in the literature. Future research should include diverse and representative samples to enhance the generalizability and robustness of findings. Careful control for genetic ancestry, potential confounders, and adoption of standardized methodologies are important for improving the precision and interpretability of results. Additionally, a comprehensive examination of literature employing alternative DNA methylation methodologies, including epigenome-wide studies and pathway-based analytical approaches oriented toward mechanistic investigation, would afford greater insight into the interplay between DNAm and internalizing and externalizing symptomatology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.