ArticleScientific reports2025
Alarming data on attitudes and practices toward COVID-19 - changes during the 1 st, 2nd and 3rd waves of the pandemic: a cross-sectional study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This manuscript presents the results research into support for the social restrictions and the application of preventive measures during the first, second and third waves of the COVID-19 pandemic. The study was conducted three times between March, 2020 and April 2021 in Poland, via the Internet using the Google Forms platform. We used self-developed questionnaires to measure support for restrictions and compliance with preventive behaviors. Both tools demonstrated adequate validity and reliability. Support for the restrictions and application of the preventive measures were statistically significantly higher during the first wave than during waves II and III. Women, younger people, individuals with higher economic status, higher education, and less work experience were more likely to support the implemented restrictions and reported greater compliance with preventive measures, especially during the third wave. A higher level of compliance with COVID-19 recommendations was not associated with poorer self-rated health or belonging to a high-risk group, but was related to a higher perceived fear of infection. The correlation between the assessment of the possibility of obtaining information about COVID-19 and support for social restrictions was significant during each wave, and its strength increased over the course of the pandemic. In summary, social restrictions and preventive measures were increasingly less supported and applied, while the importance of information about COVID-19 grew. Therefore, providing reliable, evidence-based education is essential for shaping attitudes that help reduce adverse health outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.