ArticleScientific reports2025
Explainable convolutional neural network architectures for high-performance taxonomic classification of gasteroid macrofungi.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Learning continuous activation fields from microscopic SEM images of lycoperdioid fungi via CNN-guided neural operator modeling.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Integrating scanning electron microscopy, explainable deep learning, and ITS sequencing for accurate identification in some species Geastrum.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A comparative analysis of single- and dual-backbone deep learning architectures with explainable AI for cherry leaf disease classification.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Explainable deep learning ensemble framework for accurate classification of wild poisonous mushroom species.BMC biotechnology · 2025Article
- A Comparative Analysis of CNN Architectures, Fusion Strategies, and Explainable AI for Fine-Grained Macrofungi Classification.Biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gasteroid fungi represent a morphologically diverse and taxonomically challenging group due to their convergent evolution and closed fruiting bodies. This study presents a novel deep learning-based framework for the classification of six macrofungi species: Battarrea phalloides, Crucibulum laeve, Cyathus olla, C. striatus, Tulostoma brumale, and T. fimbriatum. A total of 1200 high-resolution images were processed using eleven convolutional neural networks (CNNs), each pre-trained on ImageNet and fine-tuned for this classification task. DenseNet121 emerged as the best-performing model with 96.11% accuracy, 96.09% F1-score, and an AUC of 99.89%. ResNeXt and RepVGG followed closely with accuracies of 95.00% and 93.89%, respectively. Operational metrics showed that ShuffleNetV2 achieved the fastest inference time (0.80 s), while RepVGG exhibited the highest energy efficiency (16.5%). Explainable AI techniques, including Grad-CAM and Guided Backpropagation, were applied to enhance model interpretability, revealing biologically meaningful image regions. These results demonstrate that deep learning architectures can be effectively applied to fungal taxonomy with high accuracy and transparency. Furthermore, the proposed methodology is scalable and adaptable to other biological domains such as fungal spore classification, plant pollen analysis, and rare species identification in ecological monitoring. This study offers a robust, interpretable, and computationally efficient solution for automating biodiversity assessments using image-based AI techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.