ArticleScientific reports2025
Improving sugar beet canopy mapping through UAV image analysis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fractional vegetation cover (FVC) is an important indicator of crop growth and a key parameter in vegetation modeling. Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) equipped with RGB cameras offer a practical and cost-effective alternative to labor-intensive field surveys and multispectral imaging for FVC estimation. In this study, 18 segmentation methods, derived from the combination of six vegetation indices and three thresholding algorithms, were applied to UAV imagery of sugar beet fields during the 2022 growing season. The methods were validated using ground truth data collected from 30 plots across four growth stages. Results indicated that the Excess Green (ExG), Green Leaf Index (GLI), and Red-Green-Blue Vegetation Index (RGBVI), when combined with Otsu and Ridler-Calvard (RC) thresholding, generally provided the most accurate segmentation of vegetation cover. In particular, ExG with Otsu and RC achieved the highest accuracy (NRMSE = 5.1%, R² = 0.96), whereas ExGB with the Two-Peaks method showed the weakest performance (NRMSE = 42.3%, R² = 0.34). Statistical analyses confirmed that ExG-based approaches demonstrated stronger correlations with field measurements compared to other methods. These findings suggest that ExG in combination with Otsu or RC can be considered a promising option for UAV-based estimation of sugar beet vegetation cover, although further validation under different environmental and crop conditions is recommended.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.