ArticleScientific reports2025
Data-augmented machine learning for personalized carbohydrate-protein supplement recommendation for endurance.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Generative AI in Precision Nutrition: A Review of Current Developments and Future Directions.Nutrients · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Carbohydrate-protein supplementation often improves endurance performance. However, effectiveness varies significantly among individuals due to unique personal characteristics. This study aimed to develop a predictive machine learning framework for personalized supplementation, with a core methodological novelty in applying a Wasserstein Generative Adversarial Network with Gradient Penalty (WGAN-GP) to address the critical issue of data scarcity. Based on 231 rowing trials, the framework utilized 46 input features covering baseline characteristics and dietary intakes. Rowing distance was the performance outcome. The machine learning pipeline first utilized a hybrid feature selection method (correlation analysis, model-based importance, and domain knowledge). Following a comparative evaluation, WGAN-GP was utilized for data augmentation. Finally, several regression models (XGBoost, SVR, and MLP) were trained to predict rowing performance. The top-performing model was used to construct a personalized supplement recommendation framework. Feature selection identified 21 key indicators from 46 initial inputs. The XGBoost model, enhanced with WGAN-GP data augmentation, demonstrated the most robust performance, achieving a strong predictive accuracy (R² = 0.53) coupled with high stability. Body weight, explosive power, and nutritional inputs were key performance predictors. This study demonstrates that a data-augmented machine learning approach can effectively model individual responses to supplementation. The developed framework provides a data-driven pathway for creating personalized nutritional strategies to optimize athletic performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.