ArticleScientific reports2025
Machine learning models incorporating genotype and ancestry improve severe asthma risk prediction.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study proposes a novel machine learning (ML)-based stacking technique that integrates Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) and inferred local ancestry (LA) to improve predictive accuracy in clinical outcomes. Asthma, particularly severe asthma (SA) with poor response to inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), serves as the case study to illustrate this approach. Using data from the Biorepository and Integrative Genomics (BIG) Initiative, which includes whole-exome sequenced data from a self-reported African American pediatric cohort (N=248), we develop an ML framework to predict ICS response. After SNP data preprocessing and LA estimation, we employ stratified 10-fold cross-validation, creating base pipelines for SNP and LA data, which are then combined in stacked pipelines to assess the effectiveness of integrating these distinct data types. The stacked SNP pipeline yields an AUC of 0.693 ± 0.066 and the stacked LA pipeline yields an AUC of 0.625 ± 0.103. The integration of LA with SNP data significantly improves predictive performance, boosting the AUC to 0.729 ± 0.048 (paired t-test p-value = 0.005). Pipelines using LA data alone shows comparable performance to those using SNP data alone. However, the most important contributing features are distinct between LA and SNP data demonstrating that these data types capture distinct sources of variation and could provide complementary insights. This study highlights the potential of stacking ML pipelines, based on feature selection techniques and along with logistic regression and random forest predictive models, to integrate SNP and LA data. Such holistic approach has the promise to improve predictive performance of medication response in complex conditions like SA. This approach has broader implications for advancing personalized medicine through the effective use of multifactorial data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.