ReviewNPJ digital medicine2025
Advancing the frontier of rare disease modeling: a critical appraisal of in silico technologies.
Review in NPJ digital medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Foundation models in omics research: a comprehensive survey.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Review
- Reimagining care of people living with rare diseases with artificial intelligence.PLoS medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Rare diseases affect over 300 million people worldwide and pose unique research challenges. In silico approaches, such as mechanistic models, machine learning, and simulations, offer scalable tools for disease characterisation, drug discovery, and virtual trials. This review categorises these methods by context of use, critically appraises their strengths and limitations, and identifies barriers to translation, highlighting key opportunities and ongoing challenges in advancing computational strategies for rare disease research.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.