ReviewNature reviews. Microbiology2026
Insights into infectious diseases through ancient pathogen genomics.
Review in Nature reviews. Microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A minimal hybridization capture approach for the parallel enrichment and cost-effective detection of ancient human pathogens.iScience · 2026Article
- Three thousand five hundred years of sheeppox virus evolution inferred from archaeological and codicological genomes.Science advances · 2026Article
- Paleopathology Meets Public Health: Deep-Time Syndemics and the Ecology of Emerging Infections.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Major advances in metagenomic and biomolecular techniques have opened avenues for the recovery and sequencing of rare and highly fragmented DNA molecules from ancient biological samples, including those of pathogens that may persist in the remains of infected hosts long after their death. Initially consisting of relatively rare findings for a few disease-causing agents of historical importance, the field of ancient pathogen genomics is rapidly progressing towards genome-level analyses of larger sample sets encompassing a wider range of bacterial, viral and eukaryotic taxa. These advances have provided important insights into past pathogen distribution and genomic make-up, and the unprecedented opportunity to track their evolution 'in action' over large timescales. In this Review, we explore the major contributions of ancient DNA research to the understanding of pathogen evolution and its association with past epidemics, as well as human sociocultural and migration history, including numerous important studies that have been published in recent years. Moreover, we discuss existing limitations and future prospects of ancient pathogen genomics and the relevance of the field to current public health challenges.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41249624What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.