ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2026
Weaving the Digital Tapestry: Methods for Emulating Cohorts of Cardiac Digital Twins Using Gaussian Processes.
Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Rapid calibration of atrial electrophysiology models using Gaussian process emulators in the ensemble Kalman filter.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeDigital twin (DT) cohorts are collections of models where each member represents an individual real-world asset. DT cohorts can be used for in-silico trials, outlier detection and forecasting, and are used across engineering, industry, and increasingly in personalised medicine. To increase the scalability of DT cohorts, researchers often train emulators to be used as cheap surrogates of computationally expensive mathematical models. Frequently, each cohort member is emulated individually, without reference to other members. We propose that instead, we can treat each DT as a thread in a larger network, and that these threads can be woven together into a digital tapestry using cohort learning methods.
methodsWe propose two statistical approaches for transferring knowledge between threads. The first method, 'latent-feature emulators', utilises a latent representation of individual cohort members to generate a single emulator for the entire cohort. The second method, 'discrepancy emulators', learns the discrepancy between a new cohort member and existing members.
resultsIn two cardiac DT case studies, we show that these methods can reduce computational costs by more than 50% compared to the standard approach of training individual emulators, even in small cohorts.
conclusionsWe find that by transferring information between meshes, the cohort methods improve both the computational efficiency and the accuracy of emulators when compared to the standard approach of individually emulating each cohort member. As cohort size increases, the computational savings grow further. We focus on the use of Gaussian process emulators, but the transfer methods are applicable to other surrogate approaches such as neural networks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.