Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41249662›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical systems2025

A Dual-stage Deep Learning Framework for Breast Ultrasound Image Segmentation and Classification.

Pierangela Bruno, Megan Macrì, Carmine Dodaro

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical systems, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Pierangela BrunoDepartment of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Calabria, Rende, 87036, CS, Italy. pierangela.bruno@unical.it.
Megan MacrìDepartment of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Calabria, Rende, 87036, CS, Italy.
Carmine DodaroDepartment of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Calabria, Rende, 87036, CS, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep Learning methods have become a powerful tool in medical imaging, with great potential to improve diagnostic accuracy and support early disease detection. This is especially critical for breast cancer, one of the most common cancers among women, where early detection of abnormal tissue is crucial to improving survival rates. In this paper, we explore the application of Deep Learning techniques to segment and classify breast masses as malignant or benign using ultrasound images, aiming to support breast cancer diagnosis. We propose a modular dual-stage pipeline that first segments suspicious regions and then classifies them into benign or malignant categories. The framework is designed to flexibly integrate different backbone architectures, allowing adaptation to task- or dataset-specific requirements. Experimental results show that, within this pipeline, DeepLabV3+ with a ResNet34 encoder provided the most accurate segmentation, while lightweight classifiers such as MobileNetV3-Small and EfficientNet-B0 yielded the best classification performance. Moreover, an ablation study was conducted to tune parameters and determine their optimal configuration. Finally, our approach was tested on two breast ultrasound datasets, and the results show promising improvements in diagnostic accuracy, demonstrating the potential of our method to enhance early breast cancer detection.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsDeep LearningEarly Detection of CancerImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedImage Processing, Computer-AssistedUltrasonography, MammaryArea Under CurveDatasets as TopicFemaleHumansBreast cancerClassificationDeep learningSegmentation

Identifiers

PMID41249662
PMCPMC12628415

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.