ArticleCureus2025
Effect of an Educational Intervention on Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Non-randomized Clinical Trial.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is a life-threatening condition that requires long-term management after successful treatment in the acute phase. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a secondary prevention educational program on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) treated with percutaneous coronary angioplasty (PCI). Methods This non-randomized controlled, single-blinded, two-parallel-group trial included 122 patients who were recruited from the outpatient cardiology clinic of a university hospital in Greece from July 2022 to September 2024 and allocated equally to the intervention or the control group. Intervention group patients received an individual session, guided by a nurse, that combined the use of a structured educational video, brochure, and individual counseling. Control group patients received standard care and the brochure. Data were collected by completing the health survey (SF-36) questionnaire at baseline before the intervention and after six months of follow-up. The statistical analysis included the chi-square test for nominal data and the paired t-test and mixed design repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) for differences within and between groups at different time points. The statistical significance level was p < 0.05. Results No statistically significant differences were found in demographic and clinical scores before intervention between the two groups, confirming equivalence at baseline. Around 111 participants completed the follow-up and were included in the final analysis. Compared to baseline, at the six-month follow-up, both groups recorded statistically significantly improved scores on most dimensions of HRQoL. Using the repeated measures ANOVA test, it was found that the intervention group statistically significantly improved the general health (GH, p=0.023) subscale of HRQoL compared to the control group. Additionally, marginal significance was found in physical functioning (PF, p=0.054) and in role physical (RP, p=0.060). Conclusions This study found a statistically significant positive effect of an educational program, based on educational video and individual counseling, on the HRQoL subscale for general health and marginal significance on physical functioning and physical role. These findings highlight a potential low-cost alternative for implementation in clinical practice, especially in healthcare systems and organizations that do not have organized cardiac rehabilitation programs or are affected by limited resources.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.