ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026
Enhanced Fetal Plane Classification in Ultrasound Imaging via Prototypical Networks and Few-Shot Learning.
Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The standard fetal-plane ultrasound images are the most basic in prenatal diagnosis, but the automated classification of these images is difficult due to the paucity of labelled data and the imbalanced class distributions. We present a data-efficient framework that combines a prototypical network with a VGG19 feature extractor (FSL-VGG19) to do few-shot learning, and we compare it to four classical convolutional neural networks (CNNs): MobileNetV2, ResNet50, VGG16, and VGG19 on three publicly available fetal-ultrasound datasets: Maternal-Fetal, FPSU 23, and Africa. Five-fold cross-validation was employed in model selection. FSL-VGG19 attained the accuracies of 96.88%, 97.80%, and 94.38% on the Maternal-Fetal, FPSU 23, and Africa datasets, respectively, outperforming all the classical CNN baselines by 1.1-24.4 percentage points. These rankings of performances were proved to be statistically significant (p < 0.05) by the non-parametric Friedman test, and the Nemenyi post-hoc test was used to confirm that the superiority of FSL-VGG19 was statistically significant relative to the baselines. The sensitivity analysis showed that there was a significant positive relationship between K-shot size and accuracy with a 30.9% difference between one-shot and ten-shot learning in the Maternal-Fetal dataset. Our framework achieved competitive results than recent state-of-the-art approaches with an order of magnitude fewer labelled images. The suggested few-shot architecture minimizes the effects of annotation bottlenecks and the class-imbalance effect, and provides robust and generalizable fetal-plane classification, which is especially applicable to resource-poor clinical environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.