Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41251913›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2026

Deep-Learning Virtual Superior Mesenteric Artery Modeling for Risk Stratification in Pancreas Surgery.

Sebastián Mellado, Eduardo A Vega, Kei Yamane, Oscar Salirrosas, Ariana M Chirban, Elena Panettieri, Julia Moskal, Fumihiro Kawano, Shadi Alshammary, Etsuro Hatano and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Sebastián MelladoTufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
Eduardo A VegaDepartment of Surgery, St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4643-0634
Kei YamaneDepartment of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Oscar SalirrosasDepartment of Surgery, St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
Ariana M ChirbanUniversity of California San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Elena PanettieriDepartment of Surgery, St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
Julia MoskalDepartment of Surgery, St. Elizabeth's Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
Fumihiro KawanoCarle Illinois College of Medicine, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL, USA.
Shadi AlshammaryCarle Illinois College of Medicine, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL, USA.
Etsuro HatanoDepartment of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Claudius Conrad *Carle Illinois College of Medicine, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL, USA. cc@claudiusconrad.com.
Satoshi Ogiso *Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUnderstanding the patient-specific anatomy of the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) and its branches is of critical importance when performing a pancreatic surgery. This study assesses deep-learning-based virtual SMA modelling for three-dimensional (3D) visualization of SMA's course and branching patterns. This model is then used to correlate anatomical features with intra-/postoperative outcomes. PATIENTS AND

methodsPreoperative computed tomography (CT) scans of 124 patients undergoing pancreatic resection for pancreatic malignancy at St. Elizabeth's Medical Center and Kyoto University were analyzed for course, branching, caliber, and aortic angle using a deep learning modeling software. Following anatomic modelling, the SMA was divided into regions on the basis of its relationship to the pancreas: SMA1 (above pancreas), SMA2 (intrapancreatic), and SMA3 (below pancreas). Univariate and multivariate logistic and linear regression were used to compare anatomical measurements to perioperative outcomes.

resultsDifferences in anatomic measurements were observed between both populations. The mean caliber of SMA1, SMA2, and SMA3 was 7.05, 6.20, and 5.69 mm, respectively. A mean of 2.21 branches were observed in SMA2, and 4.52 in SMA3. Furthermore, fewer branches in SMA2 was associated with both postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) and Clavien-Dindo complication grade ≥ III. Finally, when stratified by minimally invasive approach, a greater distance between the superior border of pancreas and SMA was associated with POPF.

conclusionsThis study shows that deep-learning-based virtual three-dimensional reconstruction of SMA enables accurate assessment of the anatomical relationship between the pancreas and SMA. Specific anatomical features were found to be associated with intra- and postoperative outcomes. Therefore, SMA modeling not only contributes to improved preoperative planning and intraoperative navigation, but also to outcome prognostication.

Indexed as

Deep LearningMesenteric Artery, SuperiorPancreatectomyPancreatic NeoplasmsAdultAgedFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentTomography, X-Ray ComputedPancreatic cancerRisk stratificationSuperior mesenteric arterySurgeryVirtual modeling

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.