ArticleEnvironmental entomology2026
Effects of light pollution on development rate of the painted lady butterfly (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae).
Article in Environmental entomology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Artificial light at night (ALAN) can disrupt circadian rhythms and phenology for lepidoptera since photoperiod is a dominant cue for their life cycles. The goal of this study was to discover how ALAN exposure affects the timing of caterpillar development into chrysalis and metamorphosis into a butterfly. The painted lady butterfly (Vanessa cardui) frequents Texas from spring through fall. For this project, commercially sourced V. cardui caterpillars were used to study effects of ALAN in controlled indoor conditions, at a constant temperature of 23 °C. Throughout October 2020, April 2021, October 2021, and March 2022, caterpillars were exposed to 0, 9.5, 17.5, or 24 h of 300 lux white light emitting diode (LED) lights, and the days until chrysalis formation and butterfly emergence were observed. The 17.5 and 24 h ALAN light cycles caused butterflies to emerge 1 to 3 days faster than 9.5 h exposure. V. cardui development was expected to be faster under blue versus orange LED lights as their photoreceptors are more sensitive to blue wavelengths. This was tested in July through September of 2022 with exposure to 24 h white, blue, or orange LEDs versus no ALAN. Orange LED exposed butterflies emerged a day or 2 slower than blue or white LED exposed ones. Studies in 2023 with 12 h ALAN from white, blue, or orange LEDs yielded similar results, and hemolymph melatonin was reduced by blue LED exposures. Therefore, orange ALAN seems to be less disruptive to V. cardui metamorphosis than blue or white ALAN.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.