Evidence mapPaperPMID 41252306Full record

ReviewJournal of neuromuscular diseases2026

Paediatric medicines development for Duchenne muscular dystrophy: An EU regulatory perspective.

Sylvie Benchetrit, Céline Chu, Dimitrios Athanasiou, Sabine Scherer, Fernando de Andres Trelles, Violeta Stoyanova-Beninska, Elena H Martinez-Lapiscina, Roberto De Lisa

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of neuromuscular diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sylvie BenchetritDepartment of Europe and Innovation, Agence nationale de sécurité du médicament et des produits de santé (ANSM), Saint-Denis, France.ORCID 0000-0002-3520-6880
Céline ChuDepartment of Europe and Innovation, Agence nationale de sécurité du médicament et des produits de santé (ANSM), Saint-Denis, France.
Dimitrios AthanasiouWorld Duchenne Organization, Veenendaal, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1140-1286
Sabine SchererPaediatric and Orphan Medicinal Products Unit, Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (BfArM), Bonn, Germany.ORCID 0009-0005-0135-0955
Fernando de Andres TrellesDepartamento de Farmacología y Toxicología, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0009-0002-7941-6713
Violeta Stoyanova-BeninskaEuropean Medicines Agency (EMA), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7521-165X
Elena H Martinez-LapiscinaEuropean Medicines Agency (EMA), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Roberto De LisaEuropean Medicines Agency (EMA), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0007-0291-952X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BackgroundDuchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is a severe muscle disease with an unmet therapeutic need. Despite ongoing research efforts, only a few medicines have achieved marketing authorisation in the EU to date. We present a regulatory science overview summarising the insights obtained from the evaluation by the Paediatric Committee (PDCO) of the European Medicines Agency (EMA) of paediatric investigation plans (PIPs) for this condition, with the primary objective of providing recommendations for future developments.MethodsWe reviewed the PIPs approved by the PDCO and related regulatory procedures analysimg the available information in our own databases completing it with a search in the EU Clinical Trials Register (EudraCT) and Clinical Trials Information System (CTIS) databases to provide context.ResultsBetween January 2005 and December 2024, 16 PIPs were agreed. By 2024, 1 PIP has been completed, the remaining ones are ongoing. So far, 3 medicines for the treatment of DMD have received a positive opinion by EMA's Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP). Main characteristics and critical factors contributing to successful developments are outlined.ConclusionsThis study presents the first in-depth evaluation of PIPs approved within the EU for DMD offering insights into potential strategic approaches for clinical development of investigational medicinal products. It highlights the accumulated experience of regulators and stakeholders, particularly regarding pivotal trials that establish clinical efficacy in key patient subgroups. Furthermore, it underscores the emerging value of innovative methodologies - such as extrapolation of efficacy and integration of real-world evidence - while acknowledging persistent challenges related to data quality.

Indexed as

Drug ApprovalDrug DevelopmentMuscular Dystrophy, DuchenneChildEuropean UnionHumansdrug developmentDuchenneDuchenne muscular dystrophyEuropean medicines agencyorphan diseases

Identifiers

PMID41252306
PMCPMC13437916

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.