Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41253880›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

An assisted diagnostic and prognostic model for endometrial cancer using 36 serological markers and clinical variables from 562 patients.

Fangying Chen, Meilian Chen, Ruyun Chen, Liwei Xiao, Jiaming Huang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Fangying ChenDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, The Obstetrics & Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, 200090, People's Republic of China.
Meilian ChenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou City, 510080, Guangdong Province, People's Republic of China.
Ruyun ChenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou City, 510080, Guangdong Province, People's Republic of China.
Liwei XiaoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou City, 510080, Guangdong Province, People's Republic of China.
Jiaming HuangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou City, 510080, Guangdong Province, People's Republic of China. huangjm29@mail.sysu.edu.cn.

Funding

5010 Clinical Research Project of Sun Yat-sen University 2018018National Natural and Science Foundation of China 81902627
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endometrial carcinoma (EC) has demonstrated a concerning epidemiological trajectory. Current evaluation systems for EC are limited to postoperative analysis, necessitating the development of a preoperative risk stratification model. Researchers aimed to create a machine learning-based approach using multiple serological markers and clinical variables to predict EC characteristics. A dataset of 508 EC patients and 54 patients with endometrial atypical hyperplasia (EAH) was utilized. Seven supervised machine learning classifiers were evaluated, with the Random Forest classifier being the most effective. The use of advanced computational models that integrate diverse biological markers and clinical factors has demonstrated superior predictive accuracy for various outcomes in endometrial cancer compared to traditional single-variable regression methods. Among these models, the Random Forest classifier achieved high area under the curve (AUC) values (0.81-0.94) and exhibited strong predictive performance. Other models, including Gradient Boosting Regression, Support Vector Machine, Logistic Regression, Gaussian Naive Bayes, Neural Networks, and Elastic Net, were also evaluated. The key predictors varied depending on the specific outcomes. The machine learning approach utilizing combined serological markers and clinical variables allows effective non-invasive preoperative prediction of key EC characteristics, including diagnosis, staging, metastasis risk, and prognosis, with the Random Forest classifier proving most effective. Specifically, human epididymis protein 4 (HE4) is pivotal for risk stratification (including stages and Mayo criteria), while carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA125) excels in detecting lymph node invasion. This serum-based strategy complements invasive methods, enhancing early EC management and enabling personalized treatment.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorEndometrial NeoplasmsAdultAgedFemaleHumansMachine LearningMiddle AgedPrognosisBiomarkers, TumorEndometrial cancer (EC)Machine learningPredictionSerological markers

Identifiers

PMID41253880
PMCPMC12627715

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.