Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41254064›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Trends in access to primary care among Canadian older adults before, during, and following the COVID-19 public health emergency.

Anh N Q Pham, Iqra Akram, Muhammad Haaris Tiwana, Julia Smith

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anh N Q PhamPacific Institute on Pathogen, Pandemic and Society, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, Canada. nqp@sfu.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8967-513X
Iqra AkramFaculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, Canada.
Muhammad Haaris TiwanaFaculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, Canada.
Julia SmithPacific Institute on Pathogen, Pandemic and Society, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic significantly disrupted access to primary care, particularly for older adults with complex health needs. We conducted a cross-sectional survey to study changes in behaviours of access to primary care among Canadian older adults and how having an attached family physician (FP) impacts their experiences. People aged 65 and older living in Canada with at least one contact with the primary care since 2015 reported on their healthcare experiences across three periods: pre-, during and post-COVID-19 public health emergency. Findings from 1,899 participants revealed that while some aspects of access improved after the COVID-19, many challenges persisted. The proportion of older adults with an attached FP dropped from 87% before COVID-19 (2019) to 79% during the post period (2022–2024). Long wait times, delayed referrals, and a lack of available services remained. As a result, emotional well-being, physical activity, economic and quality of life were significantly impacted, with many respondents reported ongoing effects. Older adults with poorer health status and in rural areas are among those who experienced the greatest hardship; whilst people with a regular FP reported to have less difficulties when access to care and experienced better health outcomes.

Indexed as

Access to Primary CareCOVID-19Health Services AccessibilityPrimary Health CareAgedAged, 80 and overCanadaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMalePandemicsPublic HealthQuality of LifeSARS-CoV-2COVID-19Healthcare accessPatient satisfactionPrimary careVirtual care

Identifiers

PMID41254064
PMCPMC12627781

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.