ArticleScientific reports2025
Trends in access to primary care among Canadian older adults before, during, and following the COVID-19 public health emergency.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Population-Based Trends in Antidepressant Dispensing Among Children and Adolescents in Manitoba, Canada.Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety · 2026Article
- Trends and inequities in primary and emergency care use among older adults in British Columbia: an analysis across age, sex, income, and rurality (2018-2023).International journal for equity in health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic significantly disrupted access to primary care, particularly for older adults with complex health needs. We conducted a cross-sectional survey to study changes in behaviours of access to primary care among Canadian older adults and how having an attached family physician (FP) impacts their experiences. People aged 65 and older living in Canada with at least one contact with the primary care since 2015 reported on their healthcare experiences across three periods: pre-, during and post-COVID-19 public health emergency. Findings from 1,899 participants revealed that while some aspects of access improved after the COVID-19, many challenges persisted. The proportion of older adults with an attached FP dropped from 87% before COVID-19 (2019) to 79% during the post period (2022–2024). Long wait times, delayed referrals, and a lack of available services remained. As a result, emotional well-being, physical activity, economic and quality of life were significantly impacted, with many respondents reported ongoing effects. Older adults with poorer health status and in rural areas are among those who experienced the greatest hardship; whilst people with a regular FP reported to have less difficulties when access to care and experienced better health outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.