ArticleScientific reports2025
An empirical study on the use behavior towards AI painting tools based on TAM3 model.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Factors influencing user adoption of AI painting tools based on the AIDUA model.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Psychological and social factors influencing AI painting tool adoption among young-old adults in the context of creative aging.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Article
- The influence of designer identity on design majors' intention to use AIGC tools: an SEM-fsQCA analysis in China.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Could AI risk perception, AI learning anxiety and personal growth initiative influence university students' AI usage capability? An empirical investigation based on the control-value theory.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) applications are developing rapidly across various fields. As an emerging technology, Artificial Intelligence Painting Tools (AIPT) inspire designers in different industries to explore the adoption of these fast-developing general tools, a topic worthy of discussion. Currently, no research has empirically applied the Technology Acceptance Model 3 (TAM3) to analyze users' behavioral patterns with AIPT or investigate the factors influencing user adoption of AIPT. This study employs TAM3 to conduct an empirical investigation of Users' Behaviour (UB). A total of 645 designers participated in the survey, and the data were analyzed via Structural Equation Modeling (SEM). These findings are expected to help system developers better understand users' preferences for and acceptance of AI painting, thereby fostering product innovation in AI painting. The research results show that: Subjective Norms (SN), Facilitating Conditions (FC), and Perceived Trust (PT) significantly influence Perceived Usefulness (PU); Hedonic Motivation (HM), Social Influence (SI), and Self-Efficacy (SE) significantly affect Perceived Ease Of Use (PEOU); PU and PEOU significantly impact Behavioral Intention (BI); and BI significantly influences AIPT's User Behavior (UB). This study provides targeted insights into the adoption behavior of designers in the art field toward AIPT. These results can better motivate users to engage with AIPT for artistic creation and offer a reference for research in related domains.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.