ArticleScientific reports2025
Evidence for a severe cognitive subgroup in a comprehensive neuropsychological Post-COVID-19 syndrome classification.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Approximately 7% of adults develop Post-COVID-19 syndrome (PCS). Cognitive impairment is common, but its profile in PCS is not well defined and requires clearer differentiation from general (post-)illness effects. The aim of this study was to identify distinct cognitive profiles in PCS and to characterize them with respect to broader psychological factors such as fatigue, depression, anxiety, and personality. To this end, we assessed cognition, fatigue, depression, anxiety, and personality traits in PCS patients, convalescents (CV), healthy controls (HC), and post-viral syndrome patients (PV) of different etiology. Cognitive performance was assessed with an extensive protocol covering multiple cognitive domains, including verbal and nonverbal short-term memory, verbal and nonverbal working memory, verbal and nonverbal episodic memory, visuoconstruction, attentional functions, and executive functions, alongside patient-reported measures of fatigue, depression, anxiety, and personality, as well as self-reported information on lifetime psychiatric diagnoses. Group comparisons and discriminant analysis (p = .065) identified the tests that best differentiate the groups, while exploratory cluster analysis allowed for data-driven group assignment. In this study, N = 54 PCS, N = 42 HC, N = 25 CV, and N = 12 PV were included. Patients with PCS show low mean scores and cluster into two subgroups: 7.5% with severe objective cognitive impairments (PCS
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.