ArticleBMC gastroenterology2025
Effect of endoscopic treatment for lesions in radiotherapy field after radiotherapy for rectal cancer.
Article in BMC gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLesions manifesting after radiotherapy are difficult to treat. Significant inflammations often manifest at the rectal wall after radiotherapy, the rectal wall often experiences significant inflammation, and the intestinal cavity is typically in an edematous state.
methodsThis retrospective study included 22 patients who had previously undergone radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy and subsequently developed rectal lesions. All patients underwent either endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) or endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for lesion removal. Data on demographics, treatment modalities, time to lesion detection, lesion characteristics, and clinical outcomes were collected. The safety and efficacy of the endoscopic treatments were evaluated, with follow-up information gathered through in-person interviews and telephone calls.
resultsThe mean age of 22 patients was 62.1 years, and the mean time to lesion detection after initial treatment was 90.6 months post-initial treatment. Most patients (77.3%) had a single lesion, and EMR or ESD were successfully performed with no major postoperative complications. Most lesions were adenomas (90.3%). 72.7% of patients were alive during the entire follow-up period, and 13.6% survived for more than 5 years. No significant complications, such as perforation or bleeding, were reported.
conclusionEndoscopic resection with EMR and especially ESD appears feasible and safe for selected patients with small rectal lesions after radiotherapy. These preliminary findings highlight the importance of endoscopic surveillance for early detection and timely management. Larger multicenter studies are warranted to validate the feasibility and safety of this approach and to better define its long-term outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.