Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41254751›Full record

ReviewCritical care (London, England)2025

A clinical guide to non-invasive respiratory support in acute respiratory failure: ventilation settings, technical optimization and clinical indications.

Emanuele Rezoagli, Alice Nova, Guillaume Carteaux, Marco Giani, Domenico Luca Grieco, Tommaso Pettenuzzo, Alberto Lucchini, Paolo Navalesi, Massimo Antonelli, Giuseppe Foti and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Critical care (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Emanuele RezoagliDepartment of Emergency and Intensive Care, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei tintori, Monza, Italy. emanuele.rezoagli@unimib.it.
Alice NovaDepartment of Emergency and Intensive Care, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei tintori, Monza, Italy.
Guillaume CarteauxGroupe de Recherche Clinique CARMAS, Faculté de Santé, Université Paris Est-Créteil, Créteil Cedex, 94010, France.
Marco GianiDepartment of Emergency and Intensive Care, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei tintori, Monza, Italy.
Domenico Luca GriecoDepartment of Emergency, Intensive Care Medicine and Anesthesia, Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Fondazione Policlinico, Rome, Italy.
Tommaso PettenuzzoInstitute of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, University Hospital of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Alberto LucchiniDepartment of Emergency and Intensive Care, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei tintori, Monza, Italy.
Paolo NavalesiInstitute of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, University Hospital of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Massimo AntonelliDepartment of Emergency, Intensive Care Medicine and Anesthesia, Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Fondazione Policlinico, Rome, Italy.
Giuseppe FotiDepartment of Emergency and Intensive Care, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei tintori, Monza, Italy.
Giacomo BellaniCentre for Medical Sciences (CISMed), University of Trento, Trento, Italy.
Lise PiquilloudAdult Intensive Care Unit, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.

Funding

Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca Institutional funds
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Non-invasive respiratory support including high flow nasal therapy (HFNT), continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and Bilevel positive airway pressure (BiPAP), exerts distinct physiological effects and requires specific settings and technicalities. HFNT, delivered through dedicated nasal cannulas, provides low levels of positive airway pressure, anatomical dead space washout, allows good patient tolerance and can be used during CPAP or BiPAP breaks. CPAP and BiPAP, administered through various interfaces (e.g., facemasks, oro-nasal masks, or helmets), can deliver higher positive pressure, thereby increasing end-expiratory lung volume, reducing intrapulmonary shunt and oxygenation, with potential benefits on respiratory mechanics as well. BiPAP also delivers pressure support, aiding CO₂ clearance and respiratory muscle unloading, which is especially useful in hypercapnic respiratory failure. Increased intrathoracic pressure also reduces right ventricle preload and left ventricle afterload, which is beneficial in patients with impaired left ventricular function. Non-invasive respiratory support indications depend on the cause of acute respiratory failure. In hypercapnic respiratory failure with respiratory acidosis, BiPAP via facemask is strongly recommended to prevent intubation and reduce mortality. In cardiogenic pulmonary edema, either CPAP or BiPAP is recommended, while HFNT can be useful for patients requiring prolonged support or when CPAP/BiPAP is not tolerated even after ventilator and interface settings optimization. In de-novo acute hypoxemic respiratory failure, HFNT should be considered as the first-line treatment, regardless of the aetiology: however, in COVID-19-related AHRF CPAP can be considered to avoid intubation. The choice of non-invasive respiratory support interface in both cardiogenic and non-cardiogenic AHRF should aim at minimizing leaks, optimizing CO

Indexed as

Noninvasive VentilationRespiratory InsufficiencyContinuous Positive Airway PressureCOVID-19HumansSARS-CoV-2Acute hypercapnic respiratory failureAcute hypoxemic respiratory failureAsynchroniesBilevel positive airway pressureCardiogenic pulmonary edemaContinuous positive airway pressureFacemaskHigh flow nasal cannula oxygenationNon-invasive ventilationPatient self-inflicted lung injury

Identifiers

PMID41254751
PMCPMC12625427

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.