Evidence mapPaperPMID 41255131Full record

SynthesisDiabetes, obesity & metabolism2026

Efficacy and safety of glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists across all health outcomes in type 2 diabetes: An umbrella review and evidence map of randomised controlled trials.

Dongjin Yeo, Yeona Jo, Jinyoung Jeong, Yi Deun Jeong, Ho Geol Woo, Yejun Son, Sunyoung Kim, Sang Youl Rhee, Dong Keon Yon

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Metabolic Modulation in Cancer Care: The Potential Role of Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Dongjin YeoDepartment of Medicine, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Yeona JoCenter for Digital Health, Medical Science Research Institute, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Jinyoung JeongDepartment of Medicine, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Yi Deun JeongDepartment of Medicine, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Ho Geol WooDepartment of Medicine, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Yejun SonCenter for Digital Health, Medical Science Research Institute, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Sunyoung KimDepartment of Family Medicine, Kyung Hee University Medical Center, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Sang Youl RheeDepartment of Medicine, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-0119-5818
Dong Keon YonDepartment of Medicine, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-1628-9948

Funding

Ministry of Science and ICT, South Korea IITP-2024-RS-2024-00438239Ministry of Science and ICT, South Korea RS-2024-00509257
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimGlucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) have been established as effective treatments for type 2 diabetes, offering benefits beyond glycaemic control; however, their associations across multiple health outcomes remain insufficiently assessed. Thus, we conducted an umbrella review of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) to comprehensively evaluate the broad spectrum of their effects. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe conducted a systematic search of PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and Google Scholar through June 13, 2025, to identify meta-analyses of RCTs assessing the effects of GLP-1RAs on various health outcomes, including cardiovascular, renal, metabolic, oncologic, gastrointestinal and other domains. Effect sizes were recalculated using random-effects models and converted to equivalent odds ratios (eORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for consistency. The methodological quality of each review was assessed using the AMSTAR 2, and the certainty of evidence for each association was evaluated according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation framework (high, moderate, low or very low certainty). We preregistered our study protocol with PROSPERO (CRD420251112823).

resultsAfter applying predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, 17 studies comprising 432 RCTs were included, covering 65 unique outcomes across 6 clinical domains. GLP-1RAs use was associated with reduced risks of heart failure (eOR, 0.71 [95% CI, 0.64-0.79]; low certainty) and peripheral artery disease (0.75 [0.67-0.84]; low certainty). Drug-specific analyses exhibited protective effects of liraglutide (eOR, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.80-0.91]), albiglutide (0.65 [0.47-0.89]), and dulaglutide (0.78 [0.68-0.90]) for major cardiovascular events, myocardial infarction and stroke, respectively. Renal outcomes indicated that GLP-1RAs use was associated with reducing the risk of kidney-specific composite outcomes (eOR, 0.76 [95% CI, 0.66-0.87]; low certainty), including nephropathy (0.74 [0.61-0.92]; low certainty) and albuminuria (0.73 [0.55-0.97]; very low certainty). GLP-1RAs were also associated with reductions in body weight (eOR, 0.46 [95% CI, 0.36-0.60]; moderate certainty) and glycated haemoglobin A1c (0.83 [0.71-0.97]; high certainty), but no substantial association with cancer risk was found. Gastrointestinal adverse events, including nausea (9.62 [4.60-20.10]; high certainty), dyspepsia (4.85 [1.52-15.45]; moderate certainty), and constipation (3.39 [1.54-7.47]; high certainty), were consistently reported. GLP-1RAs use was associated with higher lumbar spine (eOR, 1.99 [95% CI, 1.38-2.85]; low certainty) and hip-neck bone mineral density (1.79 [1.08-2.98]; low certainty).

conclusionsIn this study, GLP-1RAs were associated with cardiovascular, renal, and metabolic benefits in type 2 diabetes without increasing cancer risk, though gastrointestinal adverse events were common. Our findings support the clinical use of GLP-1RAs, with attention to individual risk profiles and treatment tolerability.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor AgonistsHypoglycemic AgentsCardiovascular DiseasesHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeGlucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor AgonistsHypoglycemic Agentsglucagon‐like peptide 1 receptor agonistsmeta‐analysisrandomised controlled trialstype 2 diabetesumbrella review

Identifiers

PMID41255131
PMCPMC12803684

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.