ReviewAdvanced healthcare materials2026
Evaluating Complexity in Orthopedic Tissue-on-a-Chip Systems.
Review in Advanced healthcare materials, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Synovial fibroblasts modulate endothelial activation in an acute injury-on-a-chip model.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Orthopedic tissue-on-a-chip systems are rapidly emerging to model tissue homeostasis and disease, including to screen new therapeutics. These platforms range in complexity, related to the number of cells, materials, and other factors that are introduced into their design, which may influence their ability to mimic tissue physiology and the overall experimental throughput. To better understand current orthopedic tissue-on-a-chip platforms and their complexity, a systematic search is used to generate a library of publications. From this library, the device components (i.e., cells, materials, tissue structures, and external stimuli) and common applications are summarized, revealing that most devices are polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS)-based and include human cells, natural hydrogels, and limited tissue structures and stimuli. Next, a quantitative scoring system is developed and used to compare single versus multi tissue-on-a-chip systems across six criteria (i.e., assembly, cellular, fluidic, mechanical, structural, and readout complexity). The multi tissue-on-a-chip systems include more cell populations and materials, complicating device assembly. Additionally, total complexity negatively correlates with throughput, indicating that there is a tradeoff between the introduction of additional features and rapidly acquiring data. A clinically motivated evaluation and discussion concludes this review, which can be used to guide the development of future orthopedic tissue-on-a-chip systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.