Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41255766›Full record

ReviewTherapeutic advances in ophthalmology

Neonatal retinal hemorrhage and retinopathy of prematurity: a critical review of current practices and future directions.

Linjiang Chen, Yuhan Feng, Zhibin Xu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Therapeutic advances in ophthalmology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Linjiang ChenDepartment of Ophthalmology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Yuhan FengDepartment of Ophthalmology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Zhibin XuMedical College, Shantou University, No. 28, Qiaozhong Middle Road, Liwan District, Guangzhou, Shantou 515041, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-5933-9737

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neonatal retinal hemorrhage (RH) and retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) are significant causes of visual impairment in preterm infants, necessitating effective diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. This review synthesizes current approaches to RH and ROP management, highlighting their limitations and the critical need for standardized diagnostic criteria. Indirect ophthalmoscopy, while accessible, suffers from subjective variability, whereas wide-field digital retinal imaging, despite superior visualization, is limited by cost and training requirements. Vaginal delivery and prematurity-related factors, such as fragile retinal vasculature and neonatal complications (e.g., sepsis and hyperbilirubinemia), significantly increase RH and ROP risk, with severe RH correlating with ROP progression. Advances in digital retinal imaging and artificial intelligence (AI) offer promising solutions for early detection, enabling timely interventions such as anti-VEGF therapy to improve visual outcomes. Future directions include developing universal diagnostic standards, exploring novel treatments such as probiotics, and leveraging technologies such as optical coherence tomography. Enhanced screening programs, collaborative research, and public awareness are essential to optimize RH and ROP management, ultimately improving long-term visual prognosis for affected infants.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencedigital retinal imagingearly interventionneonatal retinal hemorrhageretinopathy of prematurity

Identifiers

PMID41255766
PMCPMC12620554

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.