ArticleFrontiers in neurology2025
Treating status epilepticus in clinical practice-a multi-national survey in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Patterns of levetiracetam and lacosamide use for treatment of status epilepticus with respect to clinical features and prior antiseizure medications.BMC neurology · 2026Observational
- Anesthetics in status epilepticus: does one size fits it all?-A scoping review on titration goals, timing, and patient selection.Frontiers in neurologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Status epilepticus (SE) is a life-threatening neurological emergency, and exhibits significant variability in clinical management despite established guidelines. This study evaluates current practices across German speaking countries. Methods: A web-based survey (December 2023-May 2024) assessed SE treatment strategies among 83 neurologists and neurointensivists from Germany, Austria, and Switzerland. Cases were presented to analyze diagnostic and therapeutic preferences. Results: The preferred benzodiazepine for first line treatment was lorazepam, chosen by 71.6% of the respondents. In the case of established SE, 35.4% chose levetiracetam as the preferred ASM. Propofol in combination with sufentanil/fentanyl was the preferred anesthetic of choice in 65.4% of respondents. For super-refractory status epilepticus (SRSE), 41.5% prefer to add further ASM, with valproic acid (67.1%), and lacosamide (64.5%) being the most frequently selected. Only 31.8% reported that their emergency services have a standard operating procedure (SOP) for SE treatment, and the choice of the preferred benzodiazepine varied in the preclinical setting, with midazolam being the most commonly used. 1) Diagnostics: Laboratory testing was universal (96.9%), but MR-imaging (10%) and clinical use of prognostic scores (6.2%) were underutilized. Conclusion: This survey highlights the variability in clinical practice for managing status epilepticus in German-speaking countries. Persistent heterogeneity in SE management underscores the need for standardized protocols, particularly in prehospital care and refractory SE therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.