Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41255796›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology2025

Treating status epilepticus in clinical practice-a multi-national survey in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland.

Leona Möller, Urs Fisch, Lena Habermehl, Clara Jünemann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Leona MöllerPhilipps University Marburg, Department of Neurology, Epilepsy Center Hessen, Marburg, Germany.
Urs FischDepartment of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.
Lena HabermehlPhilipps University Marburg, Department of Neurology, Epilepsy Center Hessen, Marburg, Germany.
Clara JünemannPhilipps University Marburg, Department of Neurology, Epilepsy Center Hessen, Marburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Status epilepticus (SE) is a life-threatening neurological emergency, and exhibits significant variability in clinical management despite established guidelines. This study evaluates current practices across German speaking countries. Methods: A web-based survey (December 2023-May 2024) assessed SE treatment strategies among 83 neurologists and neurointensivists from Germany, Austria, and Switzerland. Cases were presented to analyze diagnostic and therapeutic preferences. Results: The preferred benzodiazepine for first line treatment was lorazepam, chosen by 71.6% of the respondents. In the case of established SE, 35.4% chose levetiracetam as the preferred ASM. Propofol in combination with sufentanil/fentanyl was the preferred anesthetic of choice in 65.4% of respondents. For super-refractory status epilepticus (SRSE), 41.5% prefer to add further ASM, with valproic acid (67.1%), and lacosamide (64.5%) being the most frequently selected. Only 31.8% reported that their emergency services have a standard operating procedure (SOP) for SE treatment, and the choice of the preferred benzodiazepine varied in the preclinical setting, with midazolam being the most commonly used. 1) Diagnostics: Laboratory testing was universal (96.9%), but MR-imaging (10%) and clinical use of prognostic scores (6.2%) were underutilized. Conclusion: This survey highlights the variability in clinical practice for managing status epilepticus in German-speaking countries. Persistent heterogeneity in SE management underscores the need for standardized protocols, particularly in prehospital care and refractory SE therapy.

Indexed as

anesthetic agentsanti-seizure medicationepilepsyneurocritical careprehospital managementstatus epilepticus

Identifiers

PMID41255796
PMCPMC12620260

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.