Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41256001›Full record

ArticleResearch square2025

Cannabis Stigma and Symptom Management Considerations in Cancer Survivors: A Mixed-Methods Exploration of Patient Perspectives.

Sera Levy, Salimah Meghani, Brooke Worster, Colleen Kilanowski, Danielle Smith, Amy A Case, Rebecca L Ashare

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in Research square, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sera LevyState University of New York at Buffalo.
Salimah MeghaniUniversity of Pennsylvania School of Nursing.
Brooke WorsterThomas Jefferson University.
Colleen KilanowskiState University of New York at Buffalo.
Danielle SmithRoswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center.
Amy A CaseRoswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center.
Rebecca L AshareState University of New York at Buffalo.

Funding

Cannabis use and outcomes in ambulatory patients with cancer: A 12-month cohort studyR01CA270483 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Rebecca Ashare, Salimah H. Meghani · 2022 to 2026
$3.5M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA270483
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to assess perceived stigma among CS who use or consider use of cannabis. Methods: This study employed a convergent, parallel mixed methods design utilizing focus group and questionnaire data to assess the presence of stigma among a sample of CS (n = 23) who use (n = 10) and do not use (n = 13) cannabis to manage symptoms. CS were recruited from a multi-site observational study in the Northeast U.S. region that assesses cannabis use among oncology patients. Results: A total of 23 CS participated in this study. In general, this sample appeared to have positive attitudes towards cannabis, as indicated by quantitative results, and most CS felt accepting or neutral about other CS using cannabis, irrespective of whether they used or not. Most CS did not indicate experiences of stigma for cannabis use, did not feel judged by their medical providers, and indicated a feeling of empowerment to do whatever was needed to feel better. However, several CS reported intentional nondisclosure to their providers. Many CS discussed the presence of opioid-related stigma, both perceived from society and internalized, which appeared to play an important role in their symptom-management decision-making. Conclusions: Findings from this study suggest that while cannabis stigma may not be commonplace for CS, some do experience it. Further, opioid stigma appears to be widely perceived and intertwined in the decision-making processes for CS.

Indexed as

cannabisoncologystigmasymptom management

Identifiers

PMID41256001
PMCPMC12622175

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.