ArticleResearch square2025
Phase II proof-of-concept study of durvalumab and cediranib with and without olaparib in recurrent ovarian cancer.
Article in Research square, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Platinum-resistant epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) represents a population with limited therapeutic options. We conducted a proof-of-concept, phase II single-center, multi-arm study of durvalumab plus cediranib (D + C) or durvalumab, cediranib, and olaparib (D + O + C) in recurrent EOC. Sixty-eight patients were enrolled (D + O + C [n = 39] and D + C [n = 29]). Pre- and on-treatment biopsies and blood samples were collected for translational studies. Objective response rate was 19.4% (95% CI: 8.2-36.0) in D + O + C and 29.6% (95% CI: 13.8-50.2) in D + C. Progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.5 months for both arms. Four exceptional responders (PFS ≥ 12 months) were observed in each arm. Pre-treatment transcriptomic analysis identified that patients with exceptional response or clinical benefit (PR + SD ≥ 4 months) in both D + O + C and D + C arms demonstrated strong immune activation at baseline while D + C additionally depends on metabolic activity for response. Conversely, cytoskeletal redistribution was seen in transcriptomic data from patient tumors without clinical benefit. These findings emphasize the importance of combining immune, metabolic and cytoskeletal profiling-based treatment strategies for the future clinical studies in recurrent EOC.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.