ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025
Comprehensive aortic stenosis characterization using multi-view deep learning.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background and Aims: Accurate assessment of aortic stenosis (AS) requires integration of both structural and functional information characterized by visual traits as well as quantitation of gradients. Existing artificial intelligence (AI) models utilize solely either structural or functional information. Methods: We developed EchoNet-AS, an open-source end-to-end integrated approach combining video based convolutional neural networks to assess valve motion as well as segmentation models to automate the measurement of aortic valve peak velocity to classify AS severity. Results: EchoNet-AS was trained on 210,193 images from 16,076 studies from Kaiser Permanente Northern California (KPNC) and validated on 1,589 held-out test studies and a temporally distinct cohort of 19,206 studies. The final model was also externally validated on 2,415 studies from Stanford Healthcare (SHC) and 9,038 studies from Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (CSMC). Combining assessments from multiple echocardiographic videos and Doppler measurements, EchoNet-AS achieved excellent discrimination of severe AS with AUC 0.964 [95% CI: 0.952 - 0.973] in the KPNC held-out cohort and 0.985 [0.981 - 0.988] in the temporally distinct cohort, which was superior to models using single views or only Doppler measurements. The performance was consistently robust in distinct external cohorts with an AUC 0.985 [0.975 - 0.992] at SHC and 0.989 [0.986 - 0.992] at CSMC. Conclusions: EchoNet-AS synthesizes information from both B-mode videos and Doppler images to accurately assess AS severity. Its strong performance generalizes robustly to external validation cohorts and shows potential as an automated clinical decision support tool.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.