ReviewSmall science2025
Bioengineered Extracellular Vesicles in Emerging Cancer Vaccine Platforms.
Review in Small science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Inflammation-driven carcinogenesis in oral cancer: A systematic review of cellular mechanisms and clinical perspectives.The Indian journal of medical research · 2026Pooled it
- Engineered bacterial extracellular vesicles as next-generation precision postbiotics: strategies, challenges and prospects.Extracellular vesicles and circulating nucleic acids · 2026Review
- A Bioinspired Approach to Next-Generation Vaccines in Solid Tumors with Engineered Cell Membranes.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Amid the evolving landscape of immunotherapy, the pursuit of safer, more precise, and broadly applicable vaccine platforms has intensified. While conventional technologies-such as lipid nanoparticle-based mRNA systems-achieved unprecedented success in infectious disease prophylaxis, their limitations in safety and durability have prompted the search for alternatives to address more complex immunological challenges, particularly in oncology. Within this context, extracellular vesicle (EV)-based vaccines have emerged as a next-generation platform. These endogenously derived nanoscale vesicles, secreted by nearly all cell types, mirror the immunological identity of their origin and support diverse immune functions. Advances in EV research have enabled modular vaccine design through strategies such as antigen loading, surface engineering, and cytokine-driven modulation. Depending on their cellular source-dendritic cells, macrophages, lymphocytes, or tumor cells-EVs exhibit distinct immunological properties that allow tailored engagement of immune responses. Rather than acting solely as delivery vehicles, they integrate antigen transport, immune activation, and adjuvant effects within a single structure. Recent progress in EV-based cancer vaccine development is reviewed, encompassing vesicle biogenesis, engineering strategies, and delivery optimization, alongside emerging preclinical and clinical evidence supporting their translational potential. Finally, key challenges, including vesicle heterogeneity and manufacturing standardization, are outlined as factors that must be addressed to enable clinical advancement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.