ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
Programming human cell type-specific gene expression via an atlas of AI-designed enhancers.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Differentially active enhancers are key drivers of cell type specific gene expression. Active enhancers are found in open chromatin, which can be mapped at genome scale across tissue and cell types. Though incompletely understood, the relationship between chromatin accessibility and enhancer activity has been exploited to identify, model, and even design functional enhancers for selected cell types, but to what extent this design strategy can generalize across human cell and tissue types remains unclear. Here, we trained deep neural networks on a large corpus of chromatin accessibility data from hundreds of human biosamples. We used these models to generate an atlas of tens of thousands of synthetic enhancers, targeting hundreds of cell lines, tissues, and differentiation states, aiming to maximize accessibility in target samples and minimize it in all off-target ones. Experimental testing of thousands of designs in a representative subset of ten human cell types and in mouse retina demonstrated their function as specific enhancers, not only in the case of one-versus-all objectives but also when targeting two or three cell types. An explainable AI analysis, enabled by our large-scale enhancer measurements, allowed us to identify similarities and differences between the sequence grammar underlying accessibility and enhancer activity. Our results show that model-guided design of enhancers can help us decipher the cis-regulatory code governing cell type specificity and generate novel tools for selective targeting of human cell states.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.