ArticleCureus2025
Comparison of Glycemic and Anthropometric Parameters Among Patients With Dyspepsia and Dyslipidemia With or Without Helicobacter pylori Infection: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background/purposeThis study aimed to compare glycemic and anthropometric parameters among patients with dyspepsia and dyslipidemia, with or without
methodsThis was a cross-sectional study of 103 patients referred for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (UGE) at a public service city of Imperatriz, state of Maranhão, in Northeastern Brazil. Data collection included structured interviews to collect socioeconomic information, anthropometric assessments, and laboratory tests. Participants were categorized as follows: Group 1: dyslipidemia; Group 2:
resultsThe TyG index differed significantly across groups (median (range)): Group 1: 9.10 (8.56-11.5), Group 2: 8.18 (7.60-8.84), Group 3: 8.85 (8.18-9.59), Group 4: 8.30 (7.32-10.0; p<0.001). Body mass index (BMI; kg/m²) and waist circumference (WC; cm) were highest in Group 3 (BMI median 30.2 kg/m
conclusionDyslipidemia in dyspeptic patients without
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.