Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41257184›Full record

ArticleERJ open research2025

Economic impact of steroid-induced comorbidities in severe asthma: a SHARP CRC simulation.

Barbara Mascialino, Aruna T Bansal, Elisabeth Bel, Ratko Djukanovic, Enrico Heffler, Piotr Kuna, Renaud Louis, David Ramos-Barbon, Sabina Skrgat, Barbro Dahlen and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ERJ open research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Barbara MascialinoGSK, Verona, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4154-4728
Aruna T BansalAcclarogen Ltd, St John's Innovation Centre, Cambridge, UK.
Elisabeth BelDepartment of Pulmonology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Ratko DjukanovicNIHR, Southampton, UK.
Enrico HefflerHumanitas University, Milan, Italy.
Piotr KunaMedical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland.
Renaud LouisUniversity of Liege, Liege, Belgium.
David Ramos-BarbonHospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau and Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain.
Sabina SkrgatUniversity of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Barbro DahlenDepartment of Medicine Huddinge, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden.
Zsuzsanna CsomaNational Koranyi Institute for Pneumology, Budapest, Hungary.
Anneke Ten BrinkeMedical Centre Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands.
Liam HeaneyQueens University, Belfast, UK.
Jacob K SontDepartment of Biomedical Data Sciences, Medical Decision Making Section, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Giorgio L ColomboS.A.V.E. Studi Analisi Valutazioni Economiche, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5790-8891
Giacomo M BrunoS.A.V.E. Studi Analisi Valutazioni Economiche, Milan, Italy.
Chiara MartinottiS.A.V.E. Studi Analisi Valutazioni Economiche, Milan, Italy.
Sergio Di MatteoS.A.V.E. Studi Analisi Valutazioni Economiche, Milan, Italy.
Thomas PaulssonGSK, London, UK.
Arnaud BourdinUniversity of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4645-5209

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Patients with severe asthma (SA) consume roughly 50% of the global asthma healthcare resources due to unscheduled visits, hospitalisations, therapy and management of oral corticosteroid (OCS)-related adverse events (AEs). Biologics offer a route away from continuous OCS treatment. Asthma management guidelines discourage OCS usage, particularly when continuous and at high doses because of increased risk of OCS-AEs. This study simulates the economic burden over 10 years of reversible OCS-AEs (hypertension, psychiatric conditions, sleep disorders, dyspepsia) in SA patients in 11 European countries. Methods: The focus of this study was exclusively on the economic burden of AEs resulting from continuous OCS use in SA patients. For each country, a budget impact model estimated total AE costs in SA patients in various OCS sparing scenarios. AE costs arising from daily OCS use (reference cost) were compared to AE costs when a percentage of patients annually stops OCS, and the rate of OCS-related AEs decreases. Epidemiological data, OCS-AE prevalence values and costs were literature-based. Results: Analysis showed potential cost reductions of 13.1% to 31.6% in terms of OCS-related comorbidities over 10 years among SA patients. The size of the saving depends on the rate of onset of comorbidity, the reversibility of OCS comorbidities and the proportion of the population stopping OCS each year. Conclusion: Stopping OCS has the potential to yield substantial, long-term AE savings in SA patients.

Identifiers

PMID41257184
PMCPMC12621119

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.