ArticleERJ open research2025
Economic impact of steroid-induced comorbidities in severe asthma: a SHARP CRC simulation.
Article in ERJ open research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multimorbidity phenotypes and associated characteristics in severe asthma: an observational study of European severe asthma registries.The Lancet regional health. Europe · 2026Article
- Expanding Horizons in Severe Asthma: Anti-IgE Biosimilars and the Redefinition of Patient Selection.Allergy, asthma & immunology research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Patients with severe asthma (SA) consume roughly 50% of the global asthma healthcare resources due to unscheduled visits, hospitalisations, therapy and management of oral corticosteroid (OCS)-related adverse events (AEs). Biologics offer a route away from continuous OCS treatment. Asthma management guidelines discourage OCS usage, particularly when continuous and at high doses because of increased risk of OCS-AEs. This study simulates the economic burden over 10 years of reversible OCS-AEs (hypertension, psychiatric conditions, sleep disorders, dyspepsia) in SA patients in 11 European countries. Methods: The focus of this study was exclusively on the economic burden of AEs resulting from continuous OCS use in SA patients. For each country, a budget impact model estimated total AE costs in SA patients in various OCS sparing scenarios. AE costs arising from daily OCS use (reference cost) were compared to AE costs when a percentage of patients annually stops OCS, and the rate of OCS-related AEs decreases. Epidemiological data, OCS-AE prevalence values and costs were literature-based. Results: Analysis showed potential cost reductions of 13.1% to 31.6% in terms of OCS-related comorbidities over 10 years among SA patients. The size of the saving depends on the rate of onset of comorbidity, the reversibility of OCS comorbidities and the proportion of the population stopping OCS each year. Conclusion: Stopping OCS has the potential to yield substantial, long-term AE savings in SA patients.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.