ArticleERJ open research2025
Oscillometry findings in altered spirometry patterns and relationship to respiratory symptoms.
Article in ERJ open research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Preserved ratio impaired spirometry (PRISm) and restrictive spirometry pattern (RSP) are associated with increased morbidity and mortality, but the underlying mechanisms are unclear. Impulse oscillometry (IOS) measures small airway function more sensitively than spirometry. We aim to study the prevalence of abnormal IOS findings in relation to three spirometry patterns (obstructive, PRISm and RSP), and their associations with respiratory symptoms. Methods: In the Swedish CArdioPulmonary bioImage Study (SCAPIS), 10 360 participants aged 50-64 years underwent IOS and spirometry, and answered questionnaires on respiratory symptoms. Reference values were defined using healthy never-smoking participants. Abnormality was defined as <5th or >95th percentile, depending on the variable of interest. Results: Abnormal IOS indices were found in 31%, 38%, 28% and 40% of individuals with obstructive spirometry, only PRISm, only RSP and PRISm+RSP, respectively. Abnormal indices in individuals with obstructive spirometry (forced expiratory volume in 1 s/forced vital capacity <5th percentile) were associated with respiratory symptoms, particularly wheeze (adjusted (a)OR 2.84, 95% CI 2.02-3.99). In PRISm, abnormal indices were associated with dyspnoea (aOR 2.82, 95% CI 1.13-7.02), whereas in RSP, they were linked to wheeze (aOR 11.3, 95% CI 3.63-35.1) and any respiratory symptom (aOR 2.18, 95% CI 1.07-4.44). Abnormal indices were associated with increased sick leave due to respiratory problems in the obstructive group and the PRISm+RSP group, with highest risk in the latter (aOR 2.69, 95% CI 1.22-5.92). Conclusion: Abnormal IOS indices are common and can partially explain respiratory symptoms in individuals with altered spirometry patterns.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.